Laserfiche WebLink
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT THE 2004 MWMC WASTEWATER FACILITIES PLAN AND SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE METHODOLOGY <br /> <br />operating and maintenance costs for Alternative 5 are slightly lower compared with the <br />other alternatives. <br /> <br />Facilities Plan Question 7. What is the basis of the project cost estimate? <br />The cost estimates are developed for each project based on the current understanding of that <br />project. These estimates are generally broken down by construction categories (e.g., <br />sitework, excavation, concrete, major treatment equipment, etc.). An industry standard 25% <br />contingency is added to the construction subtotal to account for variability in equipment <br />prices, fluctuations in bidding climate, and for unknowns associated with the project. For <br />some of the projects an allowance has been added to improve the projects aesthetic appeal <br />to the neighbors. Depending on the project, this allowance may vary, but it is typically 10 % <br />of the construction subtotal. An addional 25 % allowance is added to account for surveying, <br />geotechnical exploration, engineering, design, construction management, legal, and <br />administrative costs. The resulting project cost estimates are "ground-truthed" by <br />comparing the facilities plan estimate to projects of similar scope and size that have recently <br />been constructed. For example, Corvallis recently completed construction of a digester for <br />$5.5 million. The facilities plan estimate for a fourth digester at the WPCF which is similar <br />in scope and size to the Corvallis project is $4.5 million. A second example is the headworks <br />expansion, and the Facilities Plan estimate is $12.8 million. Portland recently completed the <br />design of a similar project estimated to cost $13.2 million. <br /> <br />Facilities Plan Question 8. A previous 10-year project list was estimated at $100 <br />million. Why has the cost of implementing these projects increased by $44 <br />million? <br />The previous project list was developed from prior planning efforts. At the time when those <br />planning efforts were being done there were less stringent discharge permit requirements. <br />In May of 2002, when the new NPDES permit was issued for MWMC, some new permit <br />requirements were added. Those additions to the permit impact the cost of treating <br />wastewater. The current 20-year project list is a key outcome of the more comprehensive <br />2004 Facilities Plan and includes capital investments to address the more stringent discharge <br />permit and other regulatory requirements. Also, the following projects have been added to <br />the 20-year project list at the direction of the Commission and to fulfull previous policy <br />direction as outlined in the 1997 Biosolids Management Plan and the 2001 adopted Wet <br />Weather Flow Management Plan (WWFMP): <br /> <br />· Odor Control at MWMC Treament Plant - $6.9 million <br /> <br />· Class A Digestion - $9.2 million (two thirds of Digestion project) <br /> <br />· Conversion from chlorine to liquid bleach (sodium hypochlorite) for disinfection - $4.1 <br /> million <br /> <br /> · Effluent Reuse as a means to meet the new thermal load requirement - $20 million <br /> <br /> These items total approximately $40 million. The 20-year project list was reduced by $6 <br /> million by eliminating the 5th storage lagoon at the Biosolids Management Facility. <br /> Elimination of this project was enabled in part by the additional of the Class A portion of <br /> the digestion project. <br /> <br /> SHAWNS COMMENTS TO FAQ'S ON 4-16-04_1.DOC PAGE 7 OF 13 <br /> <br /> <br />