Laserfiche WebLink
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT THE 2004 MWMC WASTEWATER FACILITIES PLAN AND SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE METHODOLOGY <br /> <br />Table 2 presents the flow projections used in the 2004 Facilities Plan. Also shown in Table 2 <br />are the flow projections based on DEQ guidelines and the 1997 Master Plan. Flow <br />projections based on the DEQ method and the 1997 Master plan are higher than the values <br />used for the basis of planning in the 2004 Facilities Plan. MWMC is still negotiating with <br />DEQ to gain their endorsement of the proposed 2004 Facilities Plan flow projections. <br />However, DEQ may require MWMC to use the higher flow projections resulting from their <br />methodology. The flow projections recommended in the 2004 facilities plan are different <br />than those developed in the 1997 Master Plan because the 1997 Master Plan study used a <br />smaller historical data set (only 5 years of data compared to 12 years of data analyzed for <br />the current effort). The smaller data set included years with higher than average rainfall in <br />the dry season and resulted in flow projections that would be too conservative. <br /> <br />TABLE 2 - PROJECTED 2025 FLOWS USED FOR PLANNING PURPOSES <br /> 1997 Master Plan DEQ Guidlines 2004 Facility Plan <br /> <br />Dry Weather Maximum Month 66 mgd 73 mgd 59 mgd <br /> <br />Peak Wet Weather Flow Recommended a 429 mgd 277 mgd <br /> sewer system <br /> evalutation study <br /> as follow-up work. <br /> (The MWMC Wet <br /> Weather Flow <br /> Management Plan <br /> provided the follow- <br /> up work.) <br /> <br />Facilities Plan Question 11. The proposed 20-year project list includes $20 million <br />to develop approximately 10 million gallons per day (mgd) of effluent reuse. This <br />seems like a lot of money. Why is this needed? <br />The MWMC treatment plant discharge permit has a new limit for thermal load discharge <br />into Willamette River. As the wastewater flows increase, the thermal load also increases, <br />making it more difficult to meet the limit. The most cost-effective and environmentally <br />friendly way to meet the thermal load limit is to reduce the discharge of wastewater to the <br />Willamette River. One way to accomplish this is to use the treated wastewater effluent to <br />irrigate crops. This approach is called effluent reuse. The Commission is currently <br />developing facilities to reuse effluent at the Biosolids processing facility, which, in addition <br />to removing the effluent discharge from the river, will save on the cost of a significant <br />amount of fresh water that would otherwise be used. Considering that this new <br />requirement will affect MWMC's approach to effluent discharge, the Commissioners have <br />directed the development of a modest reuse program, including funds to develop 10 mgd of <br />effluent reuse. There is some uncertainty surrounding the total maximum daily load for <br />temperature in the Willamette River, and it is possible that the current thermal load limit <br />could change to become more stringent. For this planning effort it was anticipated that the <br /> <br /> SHAWNS COMMENTS TO FAQ'S ON 4-16-04_1.DOC PAGE 9 OF 13 <br /> <br /> <br />