My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item A-MWMC Facilities Plan
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2004
>
CCAgenda-05/19/04WS
>
Item A-MWMC Facilities Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:11:10 PM
Creation date
5/12/2004 3:16:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
5/19/2004
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
349
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MWMC WASTEWATER FACILITIES PLAN AND SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE UPDATE - <br /> RESPONSE TO APRIL 2, 2004, QUESTIONS FROM EUGENE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE <br /> <br />The DEQ standard considers water quality in its development of an overflow frequency <br />standard. Specifically, the standard is based on the bacteria specifications of the State water <br />quality regulations. DEQ requires that sanitary sewer collection systems not discharge <br />untreated wastewater for storm events smaller than the 5-year, 24-hour duration recurrence <br />interval during the winter months. This water quality-based standard is used by all <br />wastewater agencies throughout the State as their design criteria. Because it is based on <br />impacts to receiving water quality and takes into account the seasonal river flows, it is <br />considered a more common sense standard. It is this Oregon DEQ standard that the 20-year <br />project list is based on. Relative to the draft EPA SSO policy that would prohibit overflows <br />for nearly all wet weather events, the Oregon standard is certainly a more common sense <br />standard. If the Federal EPA SSO rule were to be implemented, there would be significant <br />increases in both projects and costs to the current 20-year project list. <br /> <br />Perhaps more importantly, however, is the set of standards and expectations that were <br />developed and adopted in the MWMC Wet Weather Flow Management Plan. Completed in <br />2001, this plan involved an exhaustive review of the performance that should be achieved in <br />managing peak flows. A citizen advisory committee (CAC), made up of a broad spectrum <br />of community interests and stakeholders, found consensus in the objective that overflows <br />should be eliminated, and that the treated wastewater should be treated to a higher <br />standard than it is currently during peak flow conditions. While the CAC did not pursue <br />the most aggressive capital improvement program, it recommended an approach that <br />balanced cost and benefits of building increased increments of peak flow capacity. The <br />Facilities Plan carries forward these citizen recommendations, which became adopted policy <br />by the MWMC and which have served as the guidance for the Cities' I/I programs since <br />2001. <br /> <br />CHAMBER OF COMMERCE RESPONSES FINAL. DOC PAGE 8 OF 8 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.