Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Eugene City Council <br />December 12, 2005 <br />Page 20f2 <br /> <br />The City is refusing to identify the impact of its park plan on the inventory of <br />developable residentialland~ Staff has explained to the Planning Commission that there is no <br />need to do this because the plan has no regulatory effect; it is the implementation that debits the <br />residential land supply. This is a fiction, which rests on the city's failure to include projects ill <br />the plan itself. The reality is that the city is on a parkland buying spree. III the past several years <br />it has bought about 182 acres ofResidential1and for parks (other than neighborhood parks). See <br />Exhibit A. Buying Residential land for parks is good, provided the residential land is replaced. <br /> <br />The city is extending its park planning into rural Lane County, witbout the concurrence <br />of the county, and without jurisdiction, This covvboy attitude win generate confusion and <br />litigation. (What would the City say if Lane County did parks planning inside the City?) The <br />City already owns and operates city parks in rural Lane County without cOlmty land use approval. <br />In recent years it has acquired another 200+ acres of county resource land fix city park use. See <br />Exhibit A.vV.hen the Wil1amalane District induded county land in its new parks plan, it had the <br />county coadopt the plan. \-Vhy is the City adverse to this jurisdiction and coordination issue? <br />\-Vhat would it be like Ii)r the City to secure county land use approvals for the parks it already <br />operates in Lane County, and then seek concurrence with the County for any parks plmming it <br />thinks must be done in the county? <br /> <br />The City has a lot of professional staff and volunteer resources invested in this plan. The higher <br />the plan has risen in the decision making process, the more content has been pulled out of it, and <br />the fmther the product has strayed from \vhat land use laws require~ The City should take a short <br />time out and be sure that: (1) the City plans only what it has authority to plan; and (2) the plan <br />contains what state and local law require it to contain - policies, maps and projects. <br /> <br />Thank you for your consideration. <br /> <br /> <br />,) <br />//} / .p <br />/'~2~/L~/~' <br /> <br />Ene!. Ex. A: City park acquisition data <br />C: Roxie Cuellar, Home Builders <br />Anna Morrison, Lane County Board of Commissioners <br />