Item B: Update on Implementation of Measure 20-106

Home Browse Search

~9.!_~9.~_ Complaint System o:~~__<2!'yman Oversight R~_~ommendations 5, Who decides the outcome of my case and what if! disagree? In an effort to achieve the best possible outcome, the proposed oversight system offers rnultipk resolution options. Tn reviewing your complaint, the auditor will determine ifyoUT case should be handled at the line supervisor level, is appropriate for alternative resolution, or requires a misconduct investigation. If an intcmal investigation is required, the auditor will monitor the case and develop an adjudication recommendation. Ultimately, the Chief of Police \vill determine the disposition of internal investigations and if the allegation is sustained, what level of discipline is warranted. If you disagree with the outcome, you can request tbat the review board take another look at your case to ensure that the investigation was thorough and fair and that the adjudication decision was consistent v.:ith the facts of the case. 6. Isn't subpoena power necessary to compel police officers to provide infom1stion needed by the board to review my case? The review board wili have access to the full investigative file, which "vin include taped interviews with the involved officers. Therefore, the commission determined that compelling testimony ,'vas unnecessary to access tbe informatlon needed to review an investigation. 7. How do! know what type of discipline occurred in my case? You will be notified of the adjudication decision and if discipline will be imposed. However, the type of discipline cannot he disclosed. Oregon public records law dictate that employee discipline records be treated confidentially and are not open to the public. The auditor will develop an annual report that will show the number and type of allegations investigated, the adjudication decisions, and type of discipline rendered. In this way, the public will have access to statistical information that explains the outcome of investigations and meets confidentiality requirements. 8. Does this model require s vote to implement? An amendment to the existing city charter will be required to enable the City COlUlcil to hire the auditor and appoint review board members. City charter amendments require an affinnative vote of the public. However, if the charter amendment vote fails, the model can be implemented under the City Manager's purview with largely the same role and responsibUities. 9. How much will this system cost? Once the oversight model is finalized, a budget will be developed that includes staffing fbr the auditor's office (approximately 3 FTE). Other costs associate-d with the model's implementation include additional investigative capacity in the internal affairs unit, and training and other requisite support tor the board to operate effectively. 10. Will the police union oppose a civifian oversight system in Eugene? The Eugene Police Employees Association (EPEA) has voiced support for additional oversight that is accountable to the public and respectful of the rights of police oHicers. The EPEA has a responsibility to ensure that the due process rights of its membership are 24