Laserfiche WebLink
<br />__m______.Police Complaint Sx~tem and Civilian Qy.~E~ight Recommt?~9..~tJons <br /> <br />o Creating a system that is not overly confusing to the puhlic or procedurally <br />complicated to maintain; and <br />o Developing a system that has credibility to employees and the public. <br /> <br />The commission discussed this issue at its Jlme 23rd meeting and considered five options for <br />detemlining which employees the oversight system had jurisdiction over. It narrowed the <br />options to the following two categories for City Council consideration. <br /> <br />L.---.....--- C~te.g-;;ries of EmPl.~y~.~~__~(;~~~~d-- <br />i 1) All EPD employees <br />I <br />I~__m_ <br /> <br />I '.n. -----'Considerations .m.._______.__.~ <br />I Simplicity and consistency in pr. ocedures <br />within the department; however, it wouid <br />create inconsistency among AFSCtv1E 1 <br />represented employees and non-sworn, non- i <br />represented employees City-wide; requires i <br />negotiation wit!!.~y'~__bargaining units. --......J <br />Maintains consistent, simple process for intake 1 <br />and allows the auditor to be aware of and ! <br />identify issues regarding investigation of all j <br />employees; targets oversight resources on <br />complaints that nonnally have highest liability <br />and community interest. <br /> <br />2) Auditor's role would include complaint <br />intake for aU EPD employees, access to all <br />EPD records and ability to monitor all <br />investigations; review board's authOlity is <br />swom employees. Board would be kept <br />apprised of all complaints through auditor's <br />__g..uarterly n..'Ports. ...__.,._. <br /> <br />Govemanf.~Jsstles <br /> <br />Another key decision point for the Council's consideration is whether it will seek voter approval <br />for a charter amendment to implement the model as proposed by the commission, and ifso, the <br />timing for the election.. The commission considered the following points when deciding whether <br />the oversight bodies should report directly to the City Council: <br />o Costs and timing constraints to enable a November 2005 ballot initiative <br />o Uncertainty ofthe election results may delay model implementation <br />o Structural independence for the auditor may be necessary to make decisions that may <br />not be othenvise supported by city management <br />o Review board will become a governing body per the public records law and subject to <br />open meetings requirements; other legal and contractual issues <br />o Model may have more credibility with the public, but is not likely to gain the support <br />of the police union <br />o More potential for politicizing the complaint process if oversight entities report to <br />elected otIicials <br />o Tangential issues associated with modifying the current city manager/council form of <br />government <br /> <br />The commission agreed that the credibility of the oversight system required that it have stTIlctural <br />independence and voted unmlimously to recommend that the City Council hire the auditor and <br />appoint the citizen review board. <br /> <br />26 <br />