Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mr. Kelly agreed with Ms. Taylor and Mr. Papé that serial levies were an absurd way to fund ongoing <br />government services. He supported the need for tax reform, and wished those feelings around the table <br />would translate into having a discussion on tax reform and tax restructuring. He said only three of nine <br />councilors identified tax reform as a priority at the council’s strategic planning retreat in February 2005. <br />He found it difficult to find enough City services to cut to avoid a library levy. He stated that he supported <br />a renewal of both the Library levy and the Youth/School-Based Services levy. Mr. Kelly said the other <br />challenge of the levy renewals was that the individual items could become a target for general dissatisfaction <br />with the government, noting that people could love the library and the services, but vote against a levy <br />because it was their only opportunity to weigh in on the budget. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly said in terms of another broad PROS measure, he understood the value of waiting until 2008. <br />However, he was worried about lost opportunities, particularly in regard to land acquisition, noting once an <br />area was developed it was no longer available for park uses. He was interested in giving staff direction to <br />consider a limited PROS bond in 2006 focused on time-sensitive items such as land acquisition for future <br />neighborhood and community parks in underserved areas, or other time sensitive projects. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman had a clear sense of what she thought would work, and she favored going out in 2006 for the <br />Library local option levy and Youth/School-Based Services levy. She said the school-based services were <br />essential in that they freed the education system to teach students. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman said city hall replacement needed to be a priority in 2008. This would then bump the PROS <br />bond measure. This was not a commentary on the plan that she had not yet seen, but rather a way to <br />sequence the vote and achieve success. She said she believed the PROS plan belonged on the 2010 ballot. <br />Ms. Bettman was intrigued by Mr. Kelly’s idea about lost opportunities, and said she may be willing to <br />consider a very reduced version if it would not prejudice the chance of the other bond to pass. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman thanked the Eugene Public Library Foundation and those who worked on the campaign for the <br />school-based services levy, and expressed hope that the same level of energy and commitment would be <br />demonstrated the next time the issues were put to the voters. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy stated that she supported both the Library and Youth/School-Based Services levies, and <br />believed it was very important to continue to support them. She liked the idea of gradually reducing the <br />City’s dependence on using levies for operating budgets. She said the tax restructuring question was a <br />worthy, albeit difficult, issue. She said there was currently a lot of great thinking around the PROS issue, <br />but she did not feel ready to make any comment on it at the present time. Mayor Piercy agreed that city hall <br />replacement and a limited PROS measures were significant. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy solicited a second round of council questions and comments. <br /> <br />In response to Mr. Pryor, Ms. Taylor said the land will not wait, and she was especially interested in natural <br />areas, many of which were under threat of development. If they were not acquired, they will be gone. She <br />said parks staff wanted to do it all at once because if there was something for all interest groups, the <br />measure was more likely to pass. As far as addressing the city hall issue first, she said people would likely <br />vote it down in 2008, resulting in it being brought up again in 2010. People were much more interested in <br />parks than replacing city hall. Ms. Taylor asked what would be cut if the library levy were reduced or <br />eliminated. She asked if the need for the levy would be eliminated if the branches were eliminated. She <br />supported branches, and suggested putting branches as one issue on the ballot, with the downtown library <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council November 16, 2005 Page 4 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br />