Laserfiche WebLink
Councilor Solomon, seconded by Councilor Taylor, moved that the City Council adopt <br />Council Bill 4905, an ordinance updating the Goal 5 inventory within the Eugene city lim- <br />its. <br /> <br />Councilor Papé noted that Councilor George Poling requested that the council not take action in his absence <br />and he wished to respect that request. He said that traditionally, the council honored such requests. <br /> <br />Councilor Solomon hoped that in the past spirit of trust and cooperation, the council would honor Mr. <br />Poling’s request. She said that City Manager Taylor indicated to her there was time on the council calendar <br />to accommodate the item at a future meeting. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman said the council had not always honored councilors’ requests to postpone action. She <br />maintained that the council’s tradition and protocol related to such requests was that they were based on <br />extenuating circumstances, such as a family illness or travel for other council business. She did not think a <br />hunting trip rose to that standard. She maintained that the community was waiting for the council to take <br />action on the item, which had long been on the council’s agenda. She would have been happy to have <br />considered the request if it were for the reasons she previously mentioned. Councilor Bettman said that <br />scheduling a hunting trip while council was in session should not preclude the council from conducting its <br />business in Councilor Poling’s absence. <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly said that the council usually honored such requests, but sometimes did not. It was his <br />recollection that the council honored such requests for the reasons mentioned by Councilor Bettman. He <br />found it troubling that Councilor Poling knew of the schedule for at least a month prior to his vacation, and <br />in fact, in his role as council president, offered the body a motion in late October to schedule the item for <br />action on this date. Had Councilor Poling worked with staff at that time, he was sure staff could have <br />rescheduled the item. That Councilor Poling requested the delay the night before the meeting Councilor <br />Kelly found “troubling, and just a wee bit manipulative.” He believed the council’s upcoming meeting <br />schedule was already full and he was concerned about further delay. He said that he would not have spent <br />as much time as he had on the amendments if he knew the item would be delayed. <br /> <br />Councilor Papé disagreed with the Councilor Bettman’s recollection. He could recall only one instance <br />where his request for postponement was not honored. He and others had asked for action to be postponed <br />for reasons other than those mentioned by Councilor Bettman and those requests were honored. He objected <br />to comments casting aspersions on Councilor Poling for his request because of his own, similar past <br />requests. He asked the council to honor its traditions. <br /> <br />Mr. Klein noted that given a motion was on the table, a councilor would have to move to postpone the <br />motion to a date certain to honor Mr. Poling’s request. <br /> <br />Councilor Papé, seconded by Councilor Solomon, moved to postpone the item. Roll call <br />vote; the motion failed, 4:3; councilors Papé, Solomon, and Pryor voting yes. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman, seconded by Councilor Taylor, moved to adopt Motion A, which would <br />add a new standard to all provisions in the land use code that allow lots to be divided such <br />that a lot could not be created that would automatically qualify for an adjustment under <br />Eugene Code (EC) 9.8030(21)(a). This adjustment is the adjustment that requires that 33 <br />percent of the lot be either within the /WR setback area, or the area that extends landward <br />beyond the setback. <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council November 14, 2005 Page 10 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />