Laserfiche WebLink
result of the proposed zoning change, he would not be able to redevelop his property to the higher densities <br />permitted by the R-2 zone and was unsure that the duplexes could be rebuilt if destroyed should the rezoning <br />go forward. He said the proposed downzoning would reduce the value of his properties and would likely <br />have a similar impact on other R-2 properties in the area. He asked if that was fair, and questioned if the <br />City would reimburse him and other owners for their lost value if Ballot Measure 37 was upheld by the <br />courts. He said the mayor and many councilors had been very vocal about holding the current urban growth <br />boundary (UGB) and developing to higher densities in the existing boundaries. If that was the goal, he <br />questioned how the council could justify the zoning being proposed for the area in question. He asked the <br />council to consider the message it was sending by approving the downzoning. <br /> <br />Mac Curtis <br />, 1391 West Broadway, a member of the Chambers Area Families for a Healthy Neighborhood <br />(CAFHN), thanked the council and mayor for its consideration of the organization’s work. He also thanked <br />Mr. Lowe, consultant Greg Brokaw, other Planning Division staff, as well as Chair John Lawless of the <br />Planning Commission for the leadership he demonstrated. He noted the many pieces of testimony submitted <br />by those in support of the plan. <br /> <br />Mr. Curtis acknowledged the applicable criteria in the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan <br />(Metro Plan) related to increasing overall density in the city; however, those policies did not provide for <br />equal density in all neighborhoods. The City’s plans also spoke to preserving existing neighborhoods, such <br />as his. He did not think the City could create plans that overrode those policies. Mr. Curtis said the <br />proposed special area zone preserved the neighborhood while increasing density. <br /> <br />th <br />Steve Pringle <br />, 1457 West 10 Avenue, a member of CAFHN, said his organization documented the <br />negative impacts of poor infill developments in the area on adjacent residents and the entire neighborhood. <br />He said that those councilors who had taken a walking tour of the neighborhood were aware of those <br />impacts. The organization determined that limiting the number of dwelling units on each lot was essential to <br />preventing further neighborhood destabilization and was consistent with City plan policies. Mr. Pringle <br />spoke to the issue of density, saying that the result of the zone would be an increase in density that exceeded <br />the council’s target for mixed-use density. He said the City would be able to accommodate anticipated <br />growth as part of its overall growth strategy and the neighborhood would be able to support it. <br /> <br />th <br />Carol DeFazio <br />, 1437 West 10 Avenue, a member of CAFHN, suggested the council consider whether its <br />decision about the zone would help Eugene grow wisely and foster a livable community. She said residents <br />already walk the talk about density and support smart growth. However, intelligent planning should not put <br />established neighborhoods at risk while promoting pale, nontraditional replicas of them at the periphery. <br />She said residents welcomed positive change and supported significant increases in density accompanied by <br />standards to ensure it occurred at a proper scale. She said the organization also encouraged diversity by <br />allowing alley access to new affordable housing. Ms. DeFazio said the current approach to density was <br />destabilizing the neighborhood and decreasing values. <br /> <br />th <br />Janice Gotchall <br />, 1461 West 10 Avenue, a member of CAFHN, noted the supporting documentation that <br />accompanied the proposed development standards for the special area zone. She said the neighbors opposed <br />previous plans because they failed to address issues of compatibility and scale. They did not address the <br />criteria related to protection of existing neighborhoods. She said the neighborhood organized many <br />meetings, formed an e-mail discussion group, established an e-web site, met with councilors, and conducted <br />walking tours. She said the result was a “win-win” collaboration between the City and residents that was <br />not previously possible. Residents were prepared to help the City move forward with the Chambers mixed- <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council November 14, 2005 Page 6 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />