Laserfiche WebLink
Councilor Papé agreed with Councilor Taylor and complimented the residents of the neighborhood for their <br />hard work, persistence, and diplomacy. He particularly recognized the work of resident Paul Conte of <br />CAFHN. <br /> <br />Councilor Solomon said she had also enjoyed the products put together by the organization. She expressed <br />appreciation to CAFHN for working with staff and to staff for its work with the organization. She <br />determined from Mr. Lowe that all area residents and property owners received notice of the public hearing. <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly also thanked the residents for their testimony and hard work. He called attention to the <br />designs guideline document and commended the work, adding he wished the council was considering design <br />guidelines rather than a proscriptive code approach. He hoped the City Council and Planning Commission <br />would consider that work in their discussions of the alternative path. <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly interpreted the council’s motion of October 12 as precluding action prior to its considera- <br />tion of a Ballot Measure 37 compensation fund, scheduled for January 25. <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly expressed interest in revising the recommendations to provide for a minimum density in the <br />area to be zoned for 15 units per acre. He also wanted to see language for an amendment that respected the <br />height limitation and design standards while allowing for condominiums and row houses. <br /> <br /> <br />6. PUBLIC HEARING AND POSSIBLE ACTION: Ordinance Vacating a Portion of the Alley <br />th <br />Right-of-Way Located Between 10 Avenue and Broadway, Parallel to Olive and Charnelton <br />Streets, Providing for an Effective Date; and Providing for a Sunset Date <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy called for ex parte contacts or conflicts of interest. There were none declared. She <br />determined that no councilor had made site visits, although Councilor Papé noted he had visited the site <br />several times. City Attorney Glenn Klein indicated that a casual drive-by did not constitute a site visit. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy opened the public hearing. There being no requests to speak, Mayor Piercy closed the public <br />hearing. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman determined from Alissa Hansen of the Planning Division that as a result of the vacation, <br />one-quarter of the alley would go to Diamond Parking. Councilor Bettman asked what compensation the <br />City would receive in return. Ms. Hansen clarified that the code allowed for the City Manager to make a <br />determination of the special assessment, which would be approved by the council. The manager was not <br />recommending an assessment in this case because the Eugene Urban Renewal Agency was initiating the <br />vacation. That was consistent with past City actions. Councilor Bettman asserted that if the Oregon <br />Research Institute (ORI) project did not come to fruition, the portion of the alley going to the Urban <br />Renewal Agency would then benefit another private party. However, she supported donating that portion of <br />right-of-way to ORI because she believed there was a large public benefit involved. Councilor Bettman <br />asked how the manager determined there was a public benefit to “giving away” City assets to Diamond <br />Parking. <br /> <br />Ms. Hansen clarified that Diamond Parking had not requested the right-of-way in question. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council November 14, 2005 Page 8 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />