My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 09/26/05 Mtg
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2005
>
CC Minutes - 09/26/05 Mtg
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 10:31:39 AM
Creation date
1/13/2006 8:37:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/1/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />th <br />Tony Biglan <br />, 2324 West 28 Avenue, provided a handout to the council. He related that he had been a <br />witness in the US Justice Department lawsuit against tobacco companies for the past four years. He noted <br />that the handout featured a chart of the 400,000 annual deaths due to cigarette smoking but it did not <br />indicate the 50,000 people who died of diseases related to secondhand smoke. He said tobacco companies <br />spent $15 billion marketing their products in the last year reported, $3 billion more than they did the <br />previous year. He stated that the cigarette companies routinely and “lavishly” funded other groups such as <br />state restaurant associations and convenience store owners to fight restrictions on the marketing of <br />cigarettes. He said, faced with restrictions on its marketing to teens, it expanded its marketing through bars. <br />He observed that the cigarette industry spends huge sums of money each year to counteract the bad <br />impression that killing 450,000 people annually made. He reviewed the tobacco industry’s smoking <br />prevention efforts and he provided written documentation to the council that the purported efforts to prevent <br />smoking were actually focused on trying to influence opinion leaders to believe that the cigarette industry <br />had become a good corporate citizen. He declared it had not. He said the activities of Phillip Morris locally <br />illustrated the massive resources the company supplied to make it safe to market cigarettes. He stressed that <br />Eugene was a college town and reiterated that the new massive marketing strategy was directed toward <br />college students. <br /> <br />Dr. Sarah Hendrickson <br />, 1036 Adams Street, Lane County Public Health Officer, commended the council <br />for approving the smoking ordinance in 2000. She underscored that the ordinance declared that employers <br />were required to provide for all employees a place to work in which employees were not exposed to the <br />smoking of others. She noted that after the Eugene ordinance was adopted, the tobacco industry helped to <br />pass a law that prevented other counties and jurisdictions in Oregon from doing this “same wonderful thing” <br />for worker protection. Dr. Hendrickson recalled that five years earlier, doctors and health care workers <br />provided the same testimony as the council heard at the present meeting. She said the council had done a <br />good job and passed the right law. Since then, she averred, the worker protection goals had been <br />undermined and, under pressure, administrators made a rule that 25 percent of outdoor smoking areas <br />should be exposed to the air. She stated that there was no scientific justification for this rule. She thought <br />the 25 percent rule had been extended far beyond smoking porches for bar customers and pictures submitted <br />to the council had demonstrated this. Dr. Hendrickson asserted that the complaint-driven process put <br />employees at risk of losing their jobs and the entity that took the complaints, Lane County Public Health <br />Department, had lost its enforcement ability when the State lost its tobacco money and had lost its focus <br />with the tragic events of September 11. She cautioned the council against codifying a definition of the <br />outdoors as changing that ordinance could open it to complaints against the original law. She recommended <br />leaving it in an administrative rule. She suggested percentages be left out, as anything codified could be <br />used as a nation-wide example and even 50 percent air exposure was not ideal. <br /> <br />Wendy Watson <br />, 33604 Indian Drive, Coburg, stated that she worked in the bar industry for 15 years. She <br />recalled that five years earlier she collected over 100 signatures from restaurant and bar workers in the city <br />of Eugene that supported the idea of being able to work in a smoke-free environment. She said this time she <br />had collected interviews of workers, owners, and their family members, copies of which she provided to the <br />council. She quoted Dave Lawrence, bar manager of Chantrelles, who said the ordinance had a positive <br />influence on his health and a negligible effect on his income. She related that he felt smoking rooms were <br />chiefly a way to circumvent the law. She also quoted Jeff Morganthaler, who worked at the Vets Club, Tiny <br />Tavern, and Black Forest, who thought rooms not open to the open air became nothing more than enclosed <br />smoking boxes, defeating the purpose for which they were set up. She said he also felt business had <br />improved because more non-smokers were going out. She thanked the City Council for taking care of the <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council September 26, 2005 Page 16 <br /> Regular Session <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.