My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 09/26/05 Mtg
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2005
>
CC Minutes - 09/26/05 Mtg
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 10:31:39 AM
Creation date
1/13/2006 8:37:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/1/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
underscore that the potential impacts on buildable, commercial, and industrial lands findings were being <br />measured against an acknowledged inventory from 1992. He hoped staff’s description was accurate and <br />that there would be no provisions in this ordinance that would leave a lot unbuildable. He said if that was <br />not the case, the ordinance would impact 43.4 acres of commercial land and over 44 acres of industrial land. <br /> <br />Mr. Connelly referred to a study the Chamber of Commerce conducted which determined that there were <br />only 113 acres of commercial land remaining. He felt any provision that would actually leave some lots <br />unbuildable would create a significant impact to the community. He supported the request to leave the <br />record open for seven days. <br /> <br />Chad Ruhoff <br />, 395 Mirror Pond Way, stated that he was a second generation builder in the city of Eugene. <br />He was concerned that his children might not be able to afford to live in the community. He averred the <br />costs had much to do with the available land supply. He felt he was paying more for the lots to build on <br />than he should have to because of the supply. He echoed concerns that this was driving growth out of <br />Eugene and, as a result, defeating council goals. He also questioned the wisdom of using 10-year-old data to <br />determine what land could be used. He stated that affordable housing no longer existed in the <br />Eugene/Springfield area and the middle class was being pushed out. He wanted the land supply to be <br />opened up in order to help stabilize prices. <br /> <br />Mike Gansen <br />, 362 Highway 99 North, #2, owner and operator of Gansen Construction Company, said his <br />company built new homes and occasionally developed small parcels of land when he could find them. He <br />reiterated that there was a current shortage of buildable land as evidenced by the huge rise in lot costs and <br />the fact that builders and principals were buying without hesitation. He wished to impress upon the council <br />that the main reason for the area having some of the highest housing prices in the country was an “artificial” <br />shortage of buildable land. He asked that the council take a hard look at the current land supply instead of <br />data from ten years earlier. Mr. Gansen also wished to point out that buildable lands in the hills were <br />located on slopes greater than 15 percent, which increased costs by a minimum of $35,000. He said <br />building on hillsides used more land because density was lower and hillside construction impacted the <br />environment. He pointed out that some areas within the UGB did not have services and had to use wells and <br />septic systems, which required more land per dwelling. <br /> <br />Bruce Mulligan <br />, 3056 Hendricks Hill Drive, vice president of the Hendricks Hill Homeowners Association, <br />conveyed the association’s support of the overlay on area 38-C and the recommendations. He wanted to <br />bring to the council’s attention the area that lay between the City limit and the UGB in that area. He <br />provided pictures of the area to the council, noting that the cattle that usually graze by the headwaters were <br />not in evidence on the day he took pictures. He pointed out that damage and erosion caused by the cattle <br />was evident. He said the association supported the land swap proposal relative to the acquisition of this <br />parcel to connect the Ridgeline Trail to Moon Mountain. He thought that in the event that the city limits <br />were extended or the city acquired this property, it would be appropriate to address Goal 5 issues. He stated <br />that some rehabilitation of the area was needed and he could not find in the regulations whether the grazing <br />was a prohibited or permitted use. <br /> <br />Mark Schutz <br />, 4066 Spring Knoll Drive, related that when purchasing his property he thought everything <br />had been researched. He said the Goal 5 measure was a surprise to him. He requested that his property be <br />removed from the inventory for the following reasons: 1) over .4 acres of the 1.26 acre lot was being <br />rezoned and having new limits placed on it; 2) newly proposed setbacks encroach on previously built and <br />established buildings and his home; and 3) plans for his property included retaining walls and cuts and fills <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council September 26, 2005 Page 7 <br /> Regular Session <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.