My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 11/28/05 Mtg
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2005
>
CC Minutes - 11/28/05 Mtg
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 10:32:54 AM
Creation date
1/13/2006 8:39:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/1/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Ms. Medary said that staff was working through the next steps of building the Environmental Education <br />Center (EEC). She stated that the federally owned “Red House property” had to be transferred into local <br />ownership in order to continue working towards a multi-partner development of the site. She explained that <br />in working with the Federal Congressional Delegation, they had been contacted by the Association of <br />Oregon and California Counties (O & C) and it identified that the BLM site was purchased with funds <br />generated from O & C lands. She stressed that the O & C had a “no net loss” policy with the BLM for O & <br />C lands and asked the BLM to honor the policy. She said staff felt the land transfer would be a “win-win <br />solution,” in that a parcel in West Eugene had been identified that had a majority of BLM funds in it as they <br />had purchased an overlying/underlying conservation easement on it. She conveyed staff’s proposal that the <br />City give the remaining fee title ownership on that piece of property to the BLM so that it could honor the <br />“no net loss” policy with the O & C Counties. <br /> <br />Ms. Medary noted that under the City ownership, the goals for the property proposed to be transferred were <br />habitat conservation, natural resource values, recreation connections and the BLM shared those same goals. <br />She stressed that this transfer did not represent any loss to the city. She asked the council to support the <br />proposal, which would happen if and when the “Red House site” was legislatively transferred to the City of <br />Eugene. She added that if the City was not able to build the ECC on that site, all of the transaction would <br />be reverted and the City would retain ownership of the Quarry Lane site, the site proposed to be transferred. <br /> <br />Councilor Poling, seconded by Councilor Solomon, moved to direct the City Manager to <br />execute a land transfer of approximately 19 acres of the Quarry Lane site to the Bureau of <br />Land Management, if needed, to satisfy the “no net loss” policy with the Association of <br />Oregon and California Counties. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman felt there was not enough information in the AIS, though it sounded like a great plan. <br />She said to receive the questions from Mr. Matthews and Ms. Segel had been troubling and this could have <br />been circumvented had there been adequate information in the AIS. <br /> <br />In response to a question from Councilor Bettman, Ms. Medary said the “Red House” site had buildings on <br />it, adding that this was one of the reasons it was considered an ideal site. Councilor Bettman asked what <br />percentage of the site had buildings on it. Ms. Medary responded that most of the site was developed. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman asked what the comparative costs of the sites were. Ms. Medary replied that the Quarry <br />Lane site had cost the City $28,000 and cost the BLM approximately $121,000. She said the City would be <br />giving its $28,000 investment and receiving in return 12 acres inside the UGB at the “Red House” site. <br /> <br />Councilor Papé questioned the equity of trading a 19-acre parcel for a 12-acre parcel. Ms. Medary <br />responded that the portion of the site on which the BLM had a conservation easement was 19 acres. She <br />averred that it made sense to pick a piece on which the BLM had already done the work to transfer it into <br />their ownership. She stressed that no additional cost would be brought about by trying to subdivide or do <br />additional survey work on the property as it stood. <br /> <br />Councilor Papé expressed concern that this would take 19 acres out of the City’s parks inventory and would <br />only receive 12 acres. Ms. Medary responded that the land would still be in the partnership and would still <br />be publicly owned and tagged together with all of the parcels in West Eugene. She recognized his point, but <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council November 28, 2005 Page 10 <br /> Regular Session <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.