Laserfiche WebLink
H. The Technical Supplement to the Metro P1 an June 1952 conf i rm~s thi s <br />analyses. It translated the projection of future o ulation into <br />pp <br />]and use needs over the then existing land uses. These needs were <br />expressed into demands for residential, commercial, and industrial <br />lands. There was no additiona] demand for parks and o en s ace <br />.beyond those acres a p p <br />. 1 ready used for such purposes by general purpose <br />. governments. The green areas in the Metro Plan diagram were not a <br />reflection of parks and open space needs. <br />I . LCOC Goal 5 requi r.es an i ventory of the "1 ocati on ~ ~ uai i t and <br />q y: <br />quanta ty" of "~ 1~ and needed or desirable for open space. .'~ The <br />Goal specifies that such areas be "managed so as to preserve their <br />original character" if no conflicting uses are identified. It <br />further provides that, "where conflicting uses have been identified <br />the economic, sa.cial, enviromental, and energy copse uences of the <br />q <br />conflicting uses shall be determined and programs deveio ed to <br />achieve the oa l , " ~ p <br />9 <br />J.Goal 5 is implemented by administrative rules adopted b LCDC 4AR <br />660-16-oao to 66016- ~ y ' <br />025, The Goal 5 inventory under these rules <br />requires an assessment of -the "1 ocati on, qua1 i ty and uanti t " of <br />Goal 5 resources and q ~ y <br />a determination of whether' an open space is <br />"needed" and entitled to Goad 5 conflicts protection. The subject <br />site far this ion amendme ~ <br />. p nt and its open space value was considered <br />during the Goal 5 inventory process which occurred rior to <br />acknowled ment. p <br />9 <br />K, The Metropolitan Pian i s based partially on a series of worki n <br />9 <br />papers addressing a variety of subjects which supported. public <br />review, adoption, and ultimately acknowledgment by the Land <br />Conservation and Development Commission of the Eu ene-S rip field <br />g p. 9 <br />Metropolitan Area Generale Plan. The acknowledgment occurred on <br />August 23, 1982. These working papers represent an im ortant <br />technical foundation for on p <br />gong appl~cat~on of the policies and <br />direction contained in the Metropolitan Plan, The relationshi of <br />the worki n a ers to the Metro o ' ~ • p <br />9 p p p 1 ~ tan Plan ~ s descry bed ~ n the Metro <br />Plan, page Iw7. <br />L. All land within the Eugene-Springfield metropolitan area includin <br />g <br />the subject site, was inventoried far potential use to satisf a <br />number of metro olitan needs in y <br />p clud~ng open space and other Goal 5 <br />resource areas. <br />M. The Metropolitan Plan diagram designates 1 and as Park and Q en S ace <br />which was not included on p p <br />the inventory of the Parks and Recreation <br />Working Paper ~e.g., land within Willamette Greenway~Boundaries . <br />. ~ <br />The inventory ~n the Parks. and Recreation Working Paper became this <br />jurisdiction's Goal 5 open space 1 and inventor as of 1982 . <br />Y <br />N. Table 1 of the Metropolitan Plan working Paper on Parks and <br />Rec~reati on shows that the metropolitan area has an inventor of about <br />5, OZO acres of Re i y <br />. g opal/Metropolitan Park and Open Space in 1918. <br />This inventory included on]y those sands used for arks <br />p and open <br />space purposes ar owned by a general purpose government for existing, <br />ar ~f uture park and open space purposes. The worki ng~ paper ro 'ected a <br />p J <br />need to acquire an additional 644 acres far parks and a en s ode. <br />p p <br />PAGE-2 <br />