Ordinance No. 19383 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

2. No evidence or contradictory information has been sub ' matted which warrants modification to that inventor or th Y e inclusionlexclusion criteria for inventories and it shoul d continue to guide land use and Goal 5 inventory decisions concerning open space and scenic views within the mete ' opol ~ tan area, 3.~ The original inventory was updated throw h the Park 9 s and Recreation Master Plan. The subject site was anal zed a y nd determined not to be needed for open space and arks. Th' analysis further sat' P ~s ~ sf~ es the Goal 5 ~ nventory requirement, 4. were the Goal 5 inventor inclusion • fy deci soon far the s site bey ng made at this time or, if such a dec~s~on were re wired as art of this lan amen • q P • p dment proceeding, the subject site would not be el ~ g~ bl a far ~ ncl use on an the open space inventory because of reaffirmation of the criteria used in this initial determination and lack of change of any significant factual circumstances or contradictory information su estin a different deli si on~. ~ gg g • In ,particular, the des. gnats on of a ports on of the. property for recreational use i n the North Cam us P1 an of. the Una verse t of are o p• Y g n ~s not a s~gn~f~cant change ~n factual circumstances. Such designation may indicate a recreational need. for the University of Oregon but i t does not affect the inventory of open space available for ublic use or the Goa . P 15 open space inventory criteria. The land is still not owned by a general purpose government and capable of dedication to eneral public use. Its intensific .,g at~on of use, to the contrary, only suggests its 1 essened ova i l abl i ty for open space preservation . 5. Even with different criteria far inclusion of the subject site on an inventory of needed open space land, this site would not be included on any .such i nventory. The analysis em 1 o ed i n the Parks and Retreat' P y . ion .Master Plan ~s re-affirmed. The availability of park lands and o en s ace in im ' ra p p mediate p x~mlty to the site Alton Baker Park, Autzen Stadium fac~l~t~es} and the lack of space far the University to ex and suggests that this site is P needed more for Un i ve~rs i ty-related purposes rather than for. open space. Money spent for .~condemnatian of the site for park land or other ublic use ac uisition could be bet P q ter spent in acquiring land already on the Gaal 5 inventory .] i sts, adjacent to exi sti n ark and 9P recreation facilities, or identified in the Master Plan acquisition priorities list. The City of Eugene presently and for the foreseeable future, lacks funds for acquisition of thi s site . Thus, the 1 ocati vn of the site ~ near other rotected o e P pn . space uses;. adjacent to the University of Oregon and needed for expansion} and the guant~ty of other open space in the metropolitan area preclude its inclusion on a Goa] 5 open s ace inventory. ~ P 5. What open space value exists for the subject ' ~ site can be protected through the developmental restraints outlined in the Riverfront Park Study setbacks, riparian stri develo ment P p preclusions, greenway conditional use permit .processes ect. . PAGE-5