Laserfiche WebLink
units per acre by adding a 14/A subdistrict. The Commission recognized <br />the desire to preserve the single-family/duplex residential character of <br />the area yet wanted to encourage additional housing near the downtown. <br />Therefore, delete Implementation Strategy 1.4 which reads as follows: <br />[Initiate rezoning of existing R-2 properties to R-2/14A. ~Thi s <br />would reduce the number of residential units allowed per acre <br />from 16 to 14 . ~ ~ <br />3, Pale 3-1~. ,I__mp1 ementati or~.,,,,5„tra_ tegi e,s,,,1.6 and 1, 7. Strategy 1, 7 refers to <br />Reso1 uti on 312D wh~~i ch prescribes pot i cy guidelines for establishing <br />institutional uses in the ~estside Neighborhood. The Council adopted the <br />resolution an April 9, 1979, to balance the neighborhood's desire to <br />preserve its residential character with the needs of certain social <br />service providers and si mi 1 ar uses to 1 acate i n areas that adequately <br />respond to the needs of their c1 i ants. <br />Implementation Strategy 1.l proposes that the list of uses in the <br />resolution be changed to include institutional uses that require a <br />conditional use permit i n resident? al zones . Tt a1 so ca11 s for close <br />scrutiny before approving institutional uses within two blocks of <br />existing i nsti tui oval uses rather than the existing standard of one-hat f <br />or one b1 ock. <br />The Commission recommended that the study of the distribution, operating <br />characteristics, and external impacts of social service institutions <br />throughout the City called for in Implementation Strategy 1.6 should <br />precede and be the basis for any changes to Resolution 312. Therefore, <br />Implementation Strategy 1.7 should be deleted. Implementation Strategy <br />1.6 on page 3-1 should be amended as fvl1ows: <br />Conduct a study of the distribution, operating characteristics, <br />and external impacts of social service institutions in the <br />City. If any Planning District is found to have a <br />disproportionate share of such facilities, the City ~should~ <br />may implement a regulatory measure to [di sparse reduce <br />possible negative external impacts of such institutional uses. <br />Also, review and monitor R-3 coned properties to determine the <br />impact of clinics on the housing supply. <br />Del ate Imp1 ementati on Strategy 1. l which reads as fo11 ows <br />Amend Resolution No, 312x, establishing a policy for <br />institutional uses in the westside Neighborhood. Amendments to <br />the resolution should include: a} modifying the list of <br />institutional uses defined to include those uses required in <br />the residential zoning districts to obtain a conditional use <br />permit; and b} enlarging the area that is reviewed when <br />approving institutional uses. Specifically, Section 1, #2-C <br />and 2'-Q of the resolution should be revised to ref 1 act that uses <br />proposed to be located within a two-block radius of one or more <br />i nsti tuti anal uses may be approved only after close scrutiny. ] <br />4. Pa a 3-2. Based on a suggestion of the Historic Review Board, add a new <br />Implementation Strategy 2.3 as follows: <br />Exhibit B - 2 <br />