Laserfiche WebLink
Title: <br />Exempts from property taxation dwelling provided by religious organization for its spiritual <br />leader and lot on which dwelling is located. Provides that exemption does not apply if <br />spiritual leader occupies another residence as primary dwelling or if religious organization <br />or occupant of dwelling receives pay for use of property, unless pay is for foster care <br />provided in dwelling. <br />Applies to property tax years beginning on or after July 1, 2010. <br />Sponsored by: By Senator MONROE (at the request of Don LaFont) <br />URL:http://www.leg.state.or.us/09reg/measpdf/sb0300.dir/sb0351.intro.pdf <br />ContactRespondentDept Updated Priority Policy Poli Numb Recommendation <br />Larry Hill Larry Hill CS-FIN 2/2/2009 Pri 1 Yes YesII. A2 Oppose <br />Comments: <br />SB 351 would have a negative financial impact on the City of Eugene. It would expand <br />the existing property tax exemption for religious property. The statutes currently exempt <br />property used for public worship, administration, education, literary, benevolent, <br />charitable, entertainment and recreational purposes by religious organizations. SB 351 <br />would expand that exemption to include a dwelling and lot provided by a religious <br />organization and used by a spirtual leader as a primary residence. Current state law <br />already exempts religious property with a assessed value of $3.1 billion. In the "2009-11 <br />Tax Expenditure Report" the Oregon Department of Revenue extimates that curent law <br />will result in a loss of $39.6 million in local property tax revenue, and an accompanying <br />shift of $14.7 million to other taxpayer, in the 2009-11 biennium. SB 351 would increase <br />these negative impacts on local governments and schools. <br />Curently within Eugene about $2.3 billion in otherwise taxable property value is exempted <br />under the dozens of kinds of property tax exemptions in state statutes. This would <br />produce about $15.8 million revenue for the City's General Fund if it were not exempt <br />property. There are continuing efforts in the Legislature to expand current exemptions <br />and add new exemptions, each of which would reduce City revenue further. <br />SB 0352 <br />Relating Clause: Relating to sobriety checkpoints; prescribing an effective date. <br />Title: <br />Authorizes law enforcement agencies to establish sobriety checkpoints. <br /> Takes effect only if Senate Joint Resolution 7 (2009) is approved by people at special <br />election held on same date as next primary election. Takes effect on effective date of <br />constitutional amendment proposed in Senate Joint Resolution 7 (2009). <br />Sponsored by: Senator MONROE <br />URL:http://www.leg.state.or.us/09reg/measpdf/sb0300.dir/sb0352.intro.pdf <br />RespondentDept Updated Priority Policy Poli Numb Recommendation <br />Contact <br />E. Cushman M. Gilbert EPD-ADM 2/3/2009 Pri 2 Yes YesV. C7 Support <br />Comments: <br />We strongly support this bill, which would authorize the use of sobriety checkpoints to <br />detect impaired drivers *only if* the voters approve an amendment to the Oregon <br />Constitution authorizing them. The bill would require that such checkpoints be conducted <br />in accordance with guidelines issued by the National Highway Traffic Safety <br />Administration. <br />We've come a long way over the past three decades with respect to reducing the DUII <br />problem but, as evidenced in the recent very tragic events locally, we still have a long <br />way to go. Across this country we are still seeing the deaths of over 40,000 people and <br />many times that number permenantly maimed and injured. A large percentage of those <br />are still attributed to impaired driving. Studies have shown that for every one DUII <br />arrested, 500 to 2000 more go driving down the road uncontacted. The variance is <br />dependent upon the level of DUII enforcement any given area gives to the problem, thus <br />proving the effectiveness of good DUII enforcement. In the areas where the incidence of <br />19 <br /> <br />