Laserfiche WebLink
<br />IGR BILL REPORT <br />February 11, 2009 <br />CITY OF EUGENE <br />HB 2319 <br />Relating Clause: Relating to persons with disabilities <br />Title: <br />Changes unlawful discrimination laws that determine if individual is person with disability <br />to be more similar to federal Americans with Disabilities Act. <br />Sponsored by: at the request of House Interim Committee on Judiciary for Oregon Advocacy Center <br />URL:http://www.leg.state.or.us/09reg/measpdf/hb2300.dir/hb2319.intro.pdf <br />ContactRespondentDept Updated Priority Policy Poli Numb Recommendation <br />Andy Fernandez CS-CMO 1/15/2009 Pri 3 No No Support <br />Comments: <br />This could make the interpretation of disability law and standards easier if ORS were in <br />line with the ADA regs. <br />HB 2377 <br />Relating Clause: Relating to use of mobile communication device while driving. <br />Title: <br />Prohibits person of any age from operating motor vehicle while using mobile <br />communication device except under certain circumstances. <br />Sponsored by: Representative TOMEI <br />URL:http://www.leg.state.or.us/09reg/measpdf/hb2300.dir/hb2377.intro.pdf <br />RespondentDept Updated Priority Policy Poli Numb Recommendation <br />Contact <br /> E. Cushman EPD-ADM 2/2/2009 Pri 3 Yes YesV. C7 Oppose <br />Comments: <br />We concur with the concerns expressed in Eric Jones' analysis of SB 329, which is <br />identical with this bill. This bill (which is also similar to SB 319) would apply to, and limit <br />the use of, two-way radios in both the public sector (e.g., public works) and the private <br />sector, although this may not be what the bill is targeting. Any police or fire vehicle that <br />meets the definition of an "emergency vehicle" (ORS 801.260) would be exempt; <br />however, the operators of any that do not would also be prohibited from using a standard <br />two-way radio. <br />One thing that the bill does that we do agree with is to delete the portion of the current <br />version of ORS 811.507 which treats it as a secondary violation (enforceable only when <br />the person has been stopped for another offense). <br />ContactRespondentDept Updated Priority Policy Poli Numb Recommendation <br />Eric Jones Eric Jones PW-ADM 2/2/2009 Pri 3 Yes YesV. C7 Oppose <br />Comments: <br />As drafted, this bill would appear to include two-way radios under the definition of "mobile <br />communication device." Public Works vehicles are not exempted from the bill. Therefore, <br />Public Works employees would not be permitted to operate two-way radios or cell <br />phones, even when responding to critical calls and weather emergencies. (see also SB <br />319, SB 329, HB 2038) <br />I defer to Tony Jobanek, as fleet manager, to determine the feasibility of installing hands- <br />free phone and radio equipment in City fleet vehicles, particularly those assigned to <br />operational patrols (e.g., sweepers, dump trucks, etc.). <br />I defer to Ellwood Cushman to respond to the law-enforcement aspects of this bill. <br />Based on the above analysis, Public Works recommends a position of priority 3 opposed, <br />unless the bill is amended to address these concerns. This is consistent with the <br />legislative position taken on HB 2645 in the 2007 legislative session. <br />1 <br /> <br />