My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 7: Resolution 4966 Approving a MUPTE for 10th and Charnelton
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2009
>
CC Agenda - 02/23/09 Meeting
>
Item 7: Resolution 4966 Approving a MUPTE for 10th and Charnelton
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:55:39 PM
Creation date
2/20/2009 12:04:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
2/23/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />The Planning and Development Director has reviewed this application and recommends approval. This <br />report is included as Exhibit B in the resolution approving the MUPTE. <br /> <br />A copy of this MUPTE application will be placed in the council office for review. <br /> <br />Public Comments <br />A display advertisement was published in the Register-Guard on December 30, 2008, soliciting <br />comments for 30 days. No comments were received during the 30-day period ending January 28, 2009. <br />The Downtown Neighborhood Association reviewed the proposed project in July 2008, and voted in <br />support of the project. The association was contacted specific to the MUPTE application on December <br />23, 2008, and has not offered any comments. <br /> <br />Design Features <br />Consistent with the council’s stated interests in the adopted MUPTE Standards and Guidelines, this <br />application proposes high density housing in the core of downtown. Although the design for the project <br />has not yet been finalized, the developers have stated their intention to construct a dense, multi-story <br />development with the following design features: <br /> <br />Compliance with Leadership in Energy & Environmental Design (LEED) and Green Building <br /> <br />? <br />Community Standards <br />Higher quality materials that contribute to longevity <br /> <br />? <br />Prominent entry facing the public street <br /> <br />? <br />Sidewalks with a minimum width of 15 feet, enhanced paving and street trees <br /> <br />? <br /> <br />Impact and Need for Tax Exemptions to Encourage Housing <br />The City and other local taxing districts forgo revenue when property is exempted from taxes. This <br />project proposes new construction on a property that is underdeveloped and under-utilized based on the <br />zoning and property potential. The land continues to be taxed during the exemption period. The <br />improvements will bring substantial revenue, after ten years, beyond what is currently being collected. <br /> <br />Fiscal Impact <br />The property is currently in public ownership and is tax exempt. Once the property is in private <br />ownership and the proposed project is complete, the development will pay annual taxes on the non- <br />housing commercial portion and a yet to be determined amount on the land itself. While the City will <br />forgo an estimated $131,526 annually on the housing portion during the 10-year exemption period, this <br />may be balanced by the income that is received from the commercial space and the land. <br /> <br />Impact and Need for Tax Exemptions to Encourage Housing <br />The City and other local taxing districts forgo revenue when property is exempted from taxes. This <br />project proposes new construction on a property that is underdeveloped and underused based on the <br />zoning. The land continues to be taxed during the exemption period. The improvements will bring <br />substantial revenue, after ten years, beyond what is currently being collected. <br /> <br />th <br />The pro-forma for the 10 and Charnelton development (Attachment C) indicates three key reasons that <br />the project would not be built without MUPTE. First, the debt coverage ratio is low at 1.06 instead of <br />the common bank preference for 1.25 or higher. Second, the perceived risk is high demonstrated by the <br />Cash on Cash return well below the market-expected 10% to 15% level. The Cash on Cash only reaches <br />Z:\CMO\2009 Council Agendas\M090223\S0902237.doc <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.