My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 11/26/08 Work Session
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2008
>
CC Minutes - 11/26/08 Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 10:32:50 AM
Creation date
2/23/2009 12:29:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Work Session
CMO_Meeting_Date
11/26/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />M I N U T E S <br /> <br /> <br />Eugene City Council <br />Work Session <br />McNutt Room – City Hall <br />777 Pearl Street—Eugene, Oregon <br /> <br /> November 26, 2008 <br /> 12:00 p.m. <br /> <br />COUNCILORS PRESENT: Chris Pryor, Andrea Ortiz, Mike Clark, George Poling, Betty Taylor. <br /> <br />COUNCILORS ABSENT: Alan Zelenka, Jennifer Solomon, Bonny Bettman <br />Her Honor Mayor Kitty Piercy called the work session meeting of the Eugene City Council to order at 12:00 <br />p.m. <br /> <br />A. WORK SESSION - Review Police Auditor Job Description <br /> <br />Acting Human Resources Director Alana Holmes gave a brief update on the recruitment process for the <br />police auditor position and directed the council to the Police Auditor Hiring Process summary document <br />included as Attachment A to the Agenda Item Summary (AIS). <br /> <br />Ms. Holmes noted that the summary was being brought before the council to determine their intent and <br />interest in the following steps of the police auditor recruitment process. <br /> <br />Interview with Mayor and City Council <br />Ms. Holmes briefly described the interview process for the Mayor and City Council regarding the police <br />auditor recruitment process as detailed in the summary document. <br /> <br />Ms. Holmes, responding to a question from Ms. Piercy, noted that the candidates could be given a brief <br />history of the police auditor position as part of the recruitment process if that was the direction of the <br />council. <br /> <br />Ms. Holmes noted that the summary under discussion was the same as for the recruitment process that had <br />been used in 2006. Ms. Ortiz noted that the process had worked well in the past. <br />Mr. Poling concurred with Ms. Ortiz’s assessment that the recruitment process used in 2006 had worked <br />very well. <br /> <br />Mr. Poling asked if any subcommittees were being formed to assist in the current recruitment process as had <br />been done in 2006. Ms. Holmes replied that there were currently no plans to have any subcommittee <br />breakouts to assist in the recruitment process. She noted that it did not appear that there would be a surplus <br />of candidates applying for the police auditor position and that no subcommittees would be necessary. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor commented that the previous recruitment process had worked very well except for the fact that <br />there had been two candidates who were clearly not qualified for the position. She felt it was important that <br />the council review the application, but hoped there might be some way to sort out undesirable <br />candidates earlier in the recruitment process this time. Mr. Poling and Mr. Clark agreed with Ms. Taylor’s <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council November 26, 2008 Page 1 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.