My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 01/12/09 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2009
>
CC Minutes - 01/12/09 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 10:26:28 AM
Creation date
2/23/2009 12:38:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Work Session
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/12/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the You Tube link so that the council could access six videos he had posted. He welcomed reactions and <br />feedback. He closed by wishing the council a happy new year. <br /> <br />Gordon Anslow <br />, 4493 Paddock Drive, asked the council to approve the Multiple-Unit Property Tax <br />Exemption (MUPTE) for the Pearl on Campus project. He said he had been involved in several other <br />projects but this was the first one in which he had ownership. He acknowledged that it was reasonable to <br />question whether a MUPTE made a reasonable difference; would a project get built without the exemption? <br />He stated that the program had been in place for a number of years and was recently modified with <br />refinements made to the qualification process. He believed that the intention was to incentivize the building <br />of multi-family projects which incorporated sufficient desirable characteristics so as to further goals the City <br />Council had identified. He averred that given the time and commitment of resources required to design a <br />complex infill redevelopment project, the investment was sufficiently great that there was a strong potential <br />that a project would not get built or it would be redesigned to reduce costs without the MUPTE. He said in <br />practice the MUPTE functioned as quid pro quo; the City would invite participants to use the program, <br />investors would make the decision to design a project with MUPTE approval in mind, the affected <br />neighborhood group would meet with the applicant and would be asked to vote in favor and the designer <br />then integrated the input garnered from such a meeting, and the applicant, having proceeded in good faith, <br />would come before the council for approval. He underscored his ongoing involvement with the West <br />University Neighbors (WUN). He said they had generally seen their projects approved for the MUPTE and <br />had always received approval from the neighborhood group. He attributed this to their willingness to shape <br />the projects with neighborhood input in mind. He noted that he currently served as co-chair of the Infill <br />Compatibility Standards Task Team and the Multi-Family Subcommittee, on which the president of WUN <br />served as chair. He felt their approach should exemplify how MUPTE could and should work, bringing <br />infill projects to the table with neighbors and providing an incentive which empowered the neighbors to ask <br />for consideration in design of the projects. He believed this would ultimately result in better projects for the <br />benefit of the owner, neighbors, tenants and the City. He provided a copy of his testimony in writing. <br /> <br />Kevin Matthews <br />, P.O. Box 1588, stated that he was President of Friends of Eugene. He welcomed the <br />council to a new year. He averred that even though the City of Eugene received “appropriate accolades” for <br />being green, it had a long way to go to “start dealing with our share of the climate change issue.” He <br />thought the City was in a position to provide leadership in the state and in the country. He acknowledged <br />that the City had conducted inventories and had state-established goals, but he believed those would be <br />shown to be too weak in the next couple of years. He advised the council that the City should “get in place” <br />plans that they could simulate and project into the future. He felt they would be “big picture plans” that <br />would help the City understand the kinds of reductions in emissions that were necessary. He declared that <br />the sooner they understood the necessary reductions, the sooner the City could be “out in front” of it. He <br />suggested that the City could use the challenge as the economic opportunity he believed it would be. He <br />asserted that if the City plotted out the vehicle technology adoption rates and looked at the turnover in <br />vehicles and then understood that driving in Eugene comprised half of the carbon emissions the City would <br />come to understand that there needed to be a 50 percent reduction of gross Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT). <br />He opined that they needed to “get into a mindset” where all transportation issues such as maintenance and <br />infrastructure planning should consider that there would be “fewer and fewer car miles driven.” <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy closed the Public Forum. <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka wished to point out that the City Council had unanimously adopted as a goal for the City <br />that it would be carbon neutral by 2020. <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council January 12, 2009 Page 2 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.