Ordinance No. 19460 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r~ ORDINANCE N0. ~!~~D AN ORDINANCE EFFECTING AMENDMENTS TO THE WHITEAKER REFINEMENT PLAN; REPEALING RESOLUTION N0. 2$99y AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. The City Counci] of the City of Eugene finds that: 1. The Whiteaker Refinement Plan was adopted by the Cit Council b .. Resolution Na. 2899 in M y y ay , 1918 . 2. On January 8, 1987, a letter was received from Ronald A. Walro a behalf of Chef Francisco re uestin n n q g a amendment to the Whiteaker Refine- ment Plan. The Planning Department contacted the Chair of the Whiteaker Community Council regarding the requested amendment and referred the to the Plannin Commi matter g ss~on. 3. The Planning Commission agreed to the canoe t of allowin riv initiated amendme ~ p g p ateiy nts to refinement plans on January 19, 1981 and, in li ht of the urgency of Chef Francisco's re e " g qu st for a plan amendment, directed staff to begin processing the proposal. 4. On January 26, 19$7, Chef Francisco submitted a detailed state ment in connection with the requested amendment to the Whiteaker Refi Written notice of nement Plan. the proposed amendment was mailed to the Whiteaker Nei h- borhood Graup, owners and occu ants of t ~ g p he subject properties, and those w~th~n a 40o-foot radius an February Z, 19$7. 5. The Eugene Planning Commission conducted a ubiic hearin ro osed amend p g on the p p ment on March 3, 1981. The retard far written testiman was held open until March 20 1987 with t ~ y s he applicant prvv~ded unt~i March 25, 1987 to submit any. additional comments . fi. On March 3a, 19$7, the Eugene Plannin Commission recommen the Cit Count' g ded to y ~i approval of Chef Francisco's requested amendment to the Whiteaker Refinement Pi an. The Commission also recommended t Council th o the C~ ty at text be added to the MU Mixed Use area descri tion vn a e Zo of the Whiteaker Refinement p p g Plan. 7. The Eugene City Council held a public hearin an the Whiteaker RefTn 9 proposed ement Plan amendment an April 13, 19$7, and considered the recommendations from the Planning Commission and members of the ' wished to be pubiTC who heard. 8. The proposed amendments are consistent with the Eu e - ' Metro oiitan Ar g ne Spr~ngf~eld p ea General Plan and the unamended portions of the Whiteaker Ref 1 nement P1 an . 9. The proposed amendments will not affect the overall i n ` ~n the Metro o a d ailacatlons p i ~ tan Area General Plan or the Whiteaker Refinement P1 an . Ordinance - 1