My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item A: Measure 37 Givings Tax
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2006
>
CC Agenda - 01/25/06 WS
>
Item A: Measure 37 Givings Tax
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:57:41 PM
Creation date
1/19/2006 8:26:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/25/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ECC <br />UGENE ITY OUNCIL <br />AIS <br />GENDA TEM UMMARY <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Work Session: Measure 37 Givings Tax <br /> <br /> <br />Meeting Date: January 25, 2006 Agenda Item Number: A <br />Department: Planning & Development/City Attorney Staff Contact: Susan Muir/Glenn Klein <br />www.eugene-or.gov Contact Telephone Number: 682-6077/682-5080 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />ISSUE STATEMENT <br /> <br />Ballot Measure 37 requires that when certain regulations restrict the use of property and reduce <br />its value, the government must pay compensation for such restrictions or waive the regulation. <br />The purpose of this work session is to explore options for the creation of a tax or charge on <br />“increases in value,” also known as a “givings tax,” in order to create a fund to pay such <br />compensation claims. <br /> <br /> <br />BACKGROUND <br /> <br />At the January 19, 2005, City Council meeting, Councilor Bettman noted that one of the impacts <br />of Measure 37 is to make it more difficult for the City to revise existing regulations and adopt <br />new regulations by requiring compensation (or waiver of the regulation) if the regulation reduces <br />the value of a property. Councilor Bettman also noted that while some regulations may reduce <br />the value of some property, other regulations (and other government actions) can also have the <br />effect of increasing the value of other property. She asked the council to hold a work session to <br />explore whether the City should pursue the creation of a tax, fee or charge to capture some of the <br />increase in value in order to fund payment of Measure 37 claims. Following a poll of the <br />council, a work session was scheduled for June 13, 2005. <br /> <br />At the June 13, 2005, meeting, the City Attorney and the Planning and Development Director <br />updated the council on what had happened to that time on Measure 37 issues, including an <br />update on what was happening in the legislative session. They also identified some of the issues <br />related to implementing a “givings tax,” including Measure 5 limitations, a legislative pre- <br />emption on a real estate transfer tax, and a significant administrative burden for developing and <br />implementing the tax. The council directed staff to undertake additional analysis and to return to <br />the council with specific options for the council to consider for a givings tax. <br /> <br />Measure 37 Litigation <br />On October 14, 2005, the Marion County Circuit Court issued a decision finding that Measure 37 <br />was unconstitutional. That decision was appealed directly to the Oregon Supreme Court. On <br />January 10, 2006, the Supreme Court held oral argument. A decision from the Supreme Court <br />most likely will be issued somewhere between early summer and the end of the year. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />L:\CMO\2006 Council Agendas\M060125\S060125A.doc <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.