Laserfiche WebLink
collection of the tax could be deferred until the property is transferred (in order to provide the <br />property owner with a source of revenue to pay the tax). <br /> <br />Determining the amount of the tax will involve two decisions: a policy decision and an <br />administrative determination. First, the council will need to determine the tax rate as part of the <br />adoption of this type of tax. Presumably, the tax rate will be a percentage of the increase in fair <br />market value resulting from the rezoning or comprehensive or refinement plan amendment. This <br />rate could be structured a number of different ways. The simplest way to structure the rate <br />would be as a straight percentage of any increase in value; for example, the rate could be 25% of <br />the amount that the property increased in value. More complicated structures could include <br />exempting a portion of the increase and taxing the remainder. In this latter alternative, the <br />council could structure the tax as follows: determine the increase in value, deduct from that <br />increase a percentage of the increase or alternatively, the amount that the property spent in <br />obtaining the rezoning, and then imposing a tax on the remainder (for example, 25%). The tax <br />rate determination is a policy decision based on the public interest, fairness, etc. <br /> <br />The second decision is the administrative decision of determining the increase in fair market <br />value resulting from the rezoning or plan amendment. This determination likely will need to be <br />based on appraisals or other evidence of the fair market value of the property before and after the <br />rezoning or plan amendment. <br /> <br />Once these two determinations have been made (the first determination would be part of the <br />ordinance and apply to all future rezonings and plan amendments), the determination of the <br />amount of tax actually owed would be a simple mathematical calculation. <br /> <br />What is the anticipated cost of administration (and what are the things that would make it <br />high or low)? <br /> <br />The costs to the City in administering this type of tax would be relatively low when compared to <br />the other three options. The universe of people subject to the tax would be easily determined <br />(property owners applying to the City for a rezoning or a plan amendment). On average, there <br />are between 25 and 50 rezonings each year. Information could be required as part of the <br />rezoning or plan amendment application, and the rezoning or plan amendment could be made <br />effective upon payment of the tax (reducing collection costs). <br /> <br />However, unless the City were willing to accept the values stated in the appraisal submitted by <br />the property owner, then the City would incur administrative costs to obtain its own appraisals. <br />The cost of such an appraisal could range anywhere from a few thousand dollars or more – <br />particularly since two values would be needed (the “before” and the “after”). In addition, where <br />the City and property owner disagreed as to value, the City would need to defend its <br />determination in front of a hearings official, and possibly in court. <br /> <br />Has the property owner paid (or will the property owner owe) other assessments, taxes or <br />fees in connection with the same triggering action? <br /> <br />Measure 50 allows assessed value (and therefore property taxes) to be increased under certain <br />circumstances, such as for additions or improvements, partitions, subdivisions, rezoning where <br />the property is used consistently with the rezoning, lot line adjustment, or the property is dis- <br />L:\CMO\2006 Council Agendas\M060125\S060125A.doc <br /> <br /> <br />