Laserfiche WebLink
Exhibit C <br />Planning Director's Findings and Recommendation <br />Annexation Request for Old Coburg Road /Chad Drive Extension <br />(City File A 08 -'n <br />Application Submitted: October 31, 2008 <br />Properties Included in Annexation Request: <br />Property Owner Address Assessor's Map <br />Tax Lots <br />Old Coburg Road Right -of -Way <br />Guard Publishing Co. 89255 Old Coburg Road 17- 03 -16 -41 <br />400 <br />Old Coburg Road LLC 89295189297189317 Old Coburg Road 17- 03 -16 -41 <br />500, 600 & 700 <br />BerrylLermerBerry 89350 Old Coburg Road 17- 03 -16 -41 <br />800 <br />Zacorn LLC 89344 Old Coburg Road 17- 03 -16 -41 <br />900 <br />Judith C. Van Trust 89326 Old Coburg Road 17- 03 -16 -41 <br />1002 <br />Harmon/Gentry/Eichorn 89385189375 Old Coburg Road 17- 03 -15 -00 <br />900 (portion) <br />Zoning: R- l 1UL Low Density Residential with Urbanizable Lands Overlay <br />Location: East of Coburg Road, west of I -5, between Chad Drive and North Game Farm Road, along Old Coburg Road <br />Representative: Jenifer Willer, City of Eugene Public Works Engineering Division, 5411682 -5364 <br />Lead City Staff: Alissa Hansen, City of Eugene Planning Division, 5411682 -5508 <br />EVALULATION: <br />Based on the information provided by the applicant, the City has determined that this request complies with Eugene <br />Code (EC) Section 9.7805 Annexation - Applicability. As such, it is subject to review and approval in accordance with <br />the requirements, application criteria and procedures of EC 9.7800 through 9.783 5. The applicable approval criteria are <br />presented below in bold typeface with findings and conclusions following each. <br />EC '9.7825(l) The land proposed to be annexed is within the city's urban grov�tb boundary and is <br />(a} Contiguous to the city limits; or <br />(b) ..:........... <br />............. <br />S eparated rom a city on y y a pu c rig o way or a s ream, : : . ay,:: a� or o er o y o <br />w� �r <br />Com lies Findings: The annexation area is within the City's urban growth boundary (UGB), and is <br />EYES ❑ No contiguous to the City limits, consistent with subsection (a). As shown in the application <br />materials and confirmed by City staff, the City limits are contiguous with the subject area of land <br />along the eastern and western boundaries. <br />EC s 782(2 � The p ro ose� annexatidu con is #ent w ap li bl . p Lip es in the l Ietro P!Ia and In any <br />. ......... <br />.. . a U+ hl� r in meat. Ians. <br />Complies Findings: Several policies from the Metro Plan provide support for this annexation by <br />EYES ❑ No encouraging compact urban growth to achieve efficient use of land and urban service provisions <br />within the UGB, including the following policies from the Growth Management section (in italic <br />text) <br />Policy 8. Land within the UGB may be converted from urbanizable to urban only through <br />annexation to a city when it is found that: <br />a. A minimum level of key urban facilities and services can be provided to the area <br />in an orderly and efficient manner. <br />b. There will be a logical area and time within which to deliver urban services and <br />facilities. Conversion of urbanizable land to urban shall also be consistent with <br />the Metro Plan. (page II -C -4) <br />Old Coburg Road (A 08 -7) February 2009 Page I <br />