My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 3: PH on Ordinance Concerning Used Merchandise Dealers
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2006
>
CC Agenda - 01/23/06 Mtg
>
Item 3: PH on Ordinance Concerning Used Merchandise Dealers
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:44:33 PM
Creation date
1/20/2006 10:37:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/23/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />is much more effective if all agencies can participate. Uniform adoption eliminates the opportunity for <br />criminals to simply sell their stolen merchandise in another community or in the unincorporated areas of <br />Lane County. Automated reporting programs are growing in North America and other jurisdictions in <br />Oregon are now contemplating the adoption of an automated reporting program. As more agencies <br />begin to utilize an integrated database, options for criminals to sell their stolen items will be even further <br />reduced. <br /> <br />Financial Considerations: <br />As described in Attachment B, a vendor with a secure database will electronically receive the automated <br />reports from each store and then make information from that database available to law enforcement <br />agencies. This would replace the current practice of detectives collecting the ‘pawn’ slips from stores <br />and clerical staff manually entering the data into a regional database. Currently, Eugene’s hourly staff <br />cost to collect, manually enter, and review a secondhand dealer transaction is estimated at $2.60 per <br />transaction. Eugene manually entered 11,238 secondhand dealer transactions in FY05 at an annual cost <br />of approximately $29,218. Vendor quotes indicate that a five-year contract, appropriate to this region’s <br />transaction levels, would total $20,200 per year for all three agencies. The transaction level sought by <br />our region would include room for increased transactions or the addition of another interested <br />jurisdiction. <br /> <br />In the proposed process for implementing and operating the automated reporting system, EPD would <br />perform the role of the administrating agency. EPD has both the administrative and financial systems <br />available to smoothly coordinate the program. A draft inter-agency agreement has been prepared to <br />determine the responsibilities and contributions of each law enforcement agency participating in the <br />program. After the initial startup of the program, it is anticipated that the cost to the city of Eugene <br />would be minimal, with an annual estimate of $700 to administer the program. This figure includes the <br />work hours required to complete the annual billings, overhead and supervisory time. <br /> <br />The anticipated savings in staff hours through the implementation of automated reporting systems would <br />be redistributed toward the detection, recovery and investigation of stolen property cases. The actual <br />cost ($20,200) of automated reporting would be borne by the regulated secondhand stores, using a tiered <br />fee schedule based on the number of annual secondhand dealer transactions. It is anticipated that the <br />annual cost to the individual secondhand store would be $200-$700 per year (see Attachment C). <br /> <br /> <br />RELATED CITY POLICIES <br />The council goals of a “Safe Community -- where people feel safe, valued and welcome,” and “Effective, <br />Accountable Municipal Government -- a government that works openly, collaboratively, and fairly with <br />the community to achieve measurable and positive outcomes” are both related to the proposed <br />ordinance. <br /> <br /> <br />COUNCIL OPTIONS <br /> <br />The council may choose to: <br /> <br />1.Take action on the item at its February 13, 2006 meeting; <br /> <br />2.Direct staff to redraft the proposed ordinance and then take action on the item at its February 13, <br />2006 meeting; or <br /> <br />3.Choose to delay action on this item until a later date. <br /> <br /> L:\CMO\2006 Council Agendas\M060123\S0601233.doc <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.