Laserfiche WebLink
appropriate that the City negotiate additional amount for these. <br />The Hearings Officer stated that he would allow until 5:04 P.M, <br />on Monday, February 15, for property owners to submit any addi- <br />ta~onal informata.on regard~.ng their assessments. He further <br />stated that he did not believe that he had any discretion to <br />negotiate figures other than had been provided by the City <br />Engineer, However, he did state that he would send a letter to <br />the City Counsel. pointing out that the process set forth in the <br />Code could be misleading to property owners, This case is such <br />an example, since the initial communication to property owners <br />estimated a cost of $44 per front foot, but the final, figures <br />were almost $70 per front foot. The Code did not require that <br />this be brought to the attention of property owners until the <br />project was completed. The Hearings Officer also stated that he <br />would view the location before submitting a recommendation to the <br />City Counsel and noted that their review of the matter would be <br />February 22, 1988. The meeting was adjourned. <br />~~,, <br />Jack A. Billings <br />Hearings Official <br />_5- <br />