Ordinance No. 19538 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

HEARINGS OFFICIAL MINUTES PAVING AND STORMS SEWERS LOCATED IN 25TH PLACE CUL-DE-SAC FROM 200 FEET WEST OF HILYARD STREET TD HILYARD STREET ~JOB# 2323} A paving and storm sewer project to serve a Cul-De-Sac on 25th Place west of Hilyard Street was initiated by a property owner with 43~ of assessable frontage, On May 4, 1987, the City mailed a letter to the other two property owners, asking if they were interested in having this roadway repaved, In that letter it was estimated that the cost would be X40 per front foot for the paving with driveway adjustments being an additional cost, This estimate was taken from the average cost of 2$ foot paving jobs constructed in the previous year, plus an inflation factor. On May 14, 19$7, a positive response was received from Mr, Charles Stults which resulted in a total of 58~ of assessable frontage in favor of the paving project, No response was received from the other property owner, Irving and Janet Carlisle, The City Engineer initiated the project as provided in the Eugene Code 7,160(8} on June 8, 1987, The property owners were notified of the pending award hearing 10 days prior to the hearing, The project was authorized for construction by the City Council on July 27, 1987. The low bid was submitted by Delta Sand & Gravel Co. for an amount of $25,132.53. The project has been completed and assessment information has been provided to property owners, A hearing regarding assessments was conducted on February 9, 1988, at 7:00 P,M, in the City Council Chambers, Hearings Official Jack A. Billings, received first a presentation by Les Lyle, City Engineer, He then received the testimony of two property owners who are in opposition to the proposed assessments, Charles Stults and Irving Carlisle. Mr, Lyle began his remarks by noting the background information set forth above, He noted that the original cast estimate pro- vided to property owners was $40 per front foot, with additional amounts necessary for driveway adjustments and the like, He stated, however, that the assessable costs turned out to be higher, He stated that these higher costs were in part because of the small project size. He noted that noone appeared at the hearing concerning the project award and that the City Council authorized the project, He noted that the purpose of this hearing is to consider the assessment amounts and notice was provided to the property owners, -1-