Ordinance No. 19584 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Lack of Consensus (First Stage)1 Tf consensus to endorse] amend the Plan in identical fashion is not reached, or if LTD or DDDT objects to the [endorsements amendment, the ~MATC~ ~iPC shall convene within 30 days of the action of the last jurisdiction to consider the ~endarsement~ amendment. [MATC] ~fPC shat l consider the actions taken by local jurisdictions and shall ro ose P P recommendations that would eliminate differences between Chase actions. ~MATC~ tlPC shall submit its recommendations to 1 ocal jurisdictions, LTD or DDDT as appropriate, If the ~MATC~ MPC process results in substantial modifications to the Plan as ~endorsed~ amended by any local jurisdiction, affected ~ur~sdict~ons shall conduct new hearings before Cendorsing~ amending the Plan as modified. - ?"he L-COG Board will be required to ratify non~reginnally significant amendments adopted by the governing body under Whose jurisdiction they fall and the regionally significant amendments adopted by Eugene, Springfield and Lane County. Public hearings conducted by the L~C4G Board shall not be required since public bearings must have been conducted by at least one agency's planning commission or govern.zng body. [Lack of Consensus (Second Stage)1 ~If consensus to endorse the Plan in an identical fashion is still Hat reached as described in the first stage, Lack of Consensus step, the P1 anni ng and Public Forks Directors sha11 schedul e a joint meeti n of elected officials from Eu ene S i g g pr ngf~eld and Lane County for the purpose of discussing the endorsement. LTD and DDQT may participate, if appropriate, ~f LTD or DDDT is involved, the LTD Board and the Dregan Transportation Commission or their designees shall participate in the joint meetings. ~f resolution on the differences is reached, the Plan sha11 be forwarded to MATC and the L-CDG Board for rati f i cati an . ~ ?. jLack of Consensus (Third Stage)~ ~If consensus to endorse the Plan in an identical fashion is Hat resolved through joint meetings, the matter wi 11 be referred to the LwCDG Board. The L-CDG Board shall endorse the Plan plus only those amendments that have been adopted i n i denti ca 1 fashion by all three 1 oval jurisdictions . This will insure that federal transportation fundin remains g uninterr~rpted.~ A recommendation from MATC for ~no endorsement could jeopardize cvnti Hued federal and state transportation funding. c 1 j rta r