Laserfiche WebLink
M I N U T E S <br />Eugene Police Auditor Ordinance Review Committee – Public Discussion Forum <br />Bascom-Tykeson Room—Downtown Library <br />th <br />100 West 10 Avenue <br />February 19, 2009 <br />5:30 p.m. <br />PRESENT: John Ahlen, Vice Chair; Joe Alsup, Kitty Piercy, Chris Pryor, Dawn Reynolds, <br />Chief Pete Kerns, Rick Brissenden, Ron Chase, Angie Sifuentez, Claire Syrett, , <br />members; Sarah Medary, Assistant City Manager; Jerry Lidz, City Attorney, <br />Ellen Teninty, Facilitator. <br />ABSENT: Tim Laue, Chair, Alan Zelenka, Norton Cabell, members. <br />[RECORDER’S NOTE: Due to the town hall nature of the forum, and that individuals did not <br />state their names. the Facilitator and Assistant City Manager, suggested that all names of the <br />community members offering comments at the February 19, 2009 PAORC public discussion <br />forum meeting be redacted. ] <br />Ms. Piercy called the meeting to order at 5:36 p.m. <br />1.Introduction and Public Discussion Forum <br />Ms. Piercy gave a brief statement thanking the participants and describing the overall goals and <br />history of the PAORC and police oversight process in the City of Eugene. Ms. Piercy added that <br />the primary goal of the committee was to develop a legal framework for police oversight that was <br />“personality proof and continues to build trust in our community.” <br />Ms. Piercy introduced the members of the committee noting that Chair Tim Laue would be <br />unable to attend the meeting due to a previous commitment. <br />Mr. Ahlen provided a brief historical context and timeline of the police auditor process in the City <br />st <br />of Eugene with the aid of a PowerPoint presentation entitled Timeline of Police Oversight 1 <br />Ballot Measure. Mr. Ahlen supplemented his presentation of the police auditor process with a <br />slide entitled Timeline of a Typical Complaint. <br />Mr. Ahlen continued to provide an overview of the basic police auditor process as it had <br />historically been applied in the City of Eugene. He noted that the system currently in practice <br />was not perfect and was in need of serious review and revision. <br />Mr. Ahlen noted that there were currently 12 proposed amendments to the City’s police auditor <br />ordinance, as well as 6 supplemental issues for future consideration regarding the ordinance, for a <br />total of 18 topics under six different categories to be discussed at the meeting. He added that the <br />public comments from the February 19 and 26 meetings would be compiled for the PAORC’s <br />report to the Eugene City Council on March 9, 2009. <br />Ms. Teninty opened the public dialogue and noted that the discussion would be broken up into the <br />six categories previously noted by Mr. Ahlen. <br /> <br />