My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 5: Action: Discussion and Approval of Non-Unanimous IGR Positions
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2009
>
CC Agenda - 03/09/09 Meeting
>
Item 5: Action: Discussion and Approval of Non-Unanimous IGR Positions
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:48:07 PM
Creation date
3/6/2009 11:55:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
3/9/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
This bill could result in Salem and Eugene having different basic speed regulations from each <br />other and different than Corvallis and Springfield. There is value in uniform driver expectations <br />and increased public safety in the predictability of the rules of the road for drivers. <br />HB 2643 <br />Relating Clause: Relating to urban renewal. <br />Title: <br />Establishes procedure by which special taxing district may be excluded from participation in <br />urban renewal plan. Requires new or substantially amended plan to state duration of plan. <br /> Permits urban renewal agency to obtain amount lesser than maximum amount from <br />diversion of tax financing method. <br /> Applies to urban renewal plans that are created or substantially amended on or after <br />effective date of Act. <br />Sponsored by: Representative HOLVEY <br />URL:http://www.leg.state.or.us/09reg/measpdf/hb2600.dir/hb2643.intro.pdf <br />RespondentDept Updated Priority Policy Poli Numb Recommendation <br />Contact <br />Larry Hill Larry Hill CS-FIN 2/17/2009 Pri 2 Yes II. A3 Oppose <br />Comments: <br />HB 2643 would potentially have negative fiancial impacts on the City of Eugene's urban renewal <br />districts. The measure would allow exclusion of an affected taxing district from an urban renewal <br />plan. Any such exclusion would reduce revenue to the urban renewal district. Urban renewal <br />districts are intended to be self-funding as a result of increased taxable property values generated <br />as a result of implementation of an urban renewal plsn. Excluding any taxing jurisdiction from a <br />urban renewal plan would allow that jurisdiction to enjoy the benefits of the increased taxable <br />value of property resulting from the urban renewal plan, without any participation in the burden of <br />financing the plan. <br />ContactRespondentDept Updated Priority Policy Poli Numb Recommendation <br />Richie Weinman PDD-DEV 2/13/2009 Pri 2 Yes II. A3 Oppose <br />Comments: <br />This bill directly relates to several adopted legislative policies, including "opposing reductions in <br />urban renewal revenue" <br />HB 2654 <br />Relating Clause: Relating to local option taxes. <br />Title: <br />Clarifies that apportionment provisions apply to local option taxes imposed by county for <br />roads. <br />Sponsored by: COMMITTEE ON REVENUE (at the request of Association of Oregon Counties) <br />URL:http://www.leg.state.or.us/09reg/measpdf/hb2600.dir/hb2654.intro.pdf <br />ContactRespondentDept Updated Priority Policy Poli Numb Recommendation <br />Larry Hill Larry Hill CS-FIN 2/17/2009 Yes II. A1 Monitor <br />Comments: <br />As introduced at the request of the Association of Oregon Counties, HB 2654 only clarifies <br />current law and would have no financial impact on the City of Eugene. However the measure <br />should be monitored to ensure that the existing language that apportions county road local option <br />levy revenue amoung county, road districts and cities is not weakened. <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.