My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 5: Action: Discussion and Approval of Non-Unanimous IGR Positions
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2009
>
CC Agenda - 03/09/09 Meeting
>
Item 5: Action: Discussion and Approval of Non-Unanimous IGR Positions
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:48:07 PM
Creation date
3/6/2009 11:55:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
3/9/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />February 25, 2009: <br /> <br />HB 2643: Allows special taxing districts to be excluded from participation in urban renewal plans; <br />requires new or substantially amended plans to state duration of plan; permits urban <br />renewal agency to obtain amount lesser than maximum amount from diversion of tax <br />financing method. <br /> <br /> Staff Recommendation: Priority 2, Oppose (By Larry Hill and Richie Weinman) <br /> IGR Committee Vote: Priority 2, Support (Taylor voting yes / Ortiz and Poling voting No) <br /> <br /> Councilor Taylor voted to support this bill noting her dislike of urban renewal districts in general. <br />Staff recommendation, however, reflects the policy adopted in the 2009 Legislative Policy <br />document which states that the City opposes reductions in urban renewal revenue. <br /> <br /> <br />RELATED CITY POLICIES <br />Ratification of IGR Committee actions is the making or affirming of the City of Eugene’s policy with <br />respect to Federal and State legislative issues or such other matters as may come to the council from the <br />committee. <br /> <br /> <br />COUNCIL OPTIONS <br /> <br />The council may ratify or decline to ratify the IGR Committee’s unanimous actions and approval of staff <br />recommendations. Actions on which the IGR committee is not unanimous must be addressed by the full <br />council in order to provide direction to staff in Salem. <br /> <br /> <br />CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION <br /> <br />The City Manager recommends ratification of the IGR Committee's actions and that there be a discussion <br />on the actions that were not unanimous. <br /> <br /> <br />SUGGESTED MOTION <br /> <br />Move to ratify the IGR Committee's unanimous actions on bills and approval of staff recommendations <br />in the February 25 and March 4, 2009, IGR Bill Reports for bills not pulled for discussion at those IGR <br />meetings. <br /> <br />There also needs to be motions to state positions for each bill listed above where the IGR Committee action <br />was not unanimous. <br /> <br /> <br />ATTACHMENTS <br /> <br />A. Bill and Staff Comments on Non-Unanimous Actions <br />B. February 25, 2009 IGR Bill Report <br />C. March 4, 2009 IGR Bill Report <br /> <br /> <br /> Z:\CMO\2009 Council Agendas\M090309\S0903095.doc <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.