Laserfiche WebLink
<br />At its May 23, 2007, meeting, the council approved a general course of action that was intended to lead to <br />the implementation of a package of strategies, including a capital local levy, a street utility fee based on <br />parking, a street and bike path lighting fee, and an increase to the current local motor vehicle fuel tax. <br /> <br />On November 12, 2008, the City Manager provided the council with an update about the status of the <br />Road Fund as well as his intended interim funding strategies to keep these critical City services funded for <br />FY10 and beyond. At that meeting, individual councilors acknowledged that the Road Fund funding <br />shortfalls could not be found in service reductions alone and that the need to find new sources of City <br />revenue for transportation systems was great. It was suggested that this looming problem would best be <br />met by a combination of cost reductions/reorganizations and new or enhanced revenue sources. The street <br />utility fee continues to have support by council as part of the long-term funding solution, although there <br />was acknowledgement of the complexities involved in assessing such a fee. <br /> <br />On February 8, 2009, the council discussed two new potential revenue sources for preserving existing <br />street O&M services—a right-of-way use fee (similar to a franchise fee) on City-owned utilities, and a <br />transportation surcharge on solid waste (garbage) haulers. Councilors discussed the need for two different <br />sets of funding strategies, with the first being a one-time, “stop gap” plan for fully funding these critical <br />services in FY10. There was some interest in further exploring the proposed garbage surcharge, but at a <br />much lower level. There was also support expressed for looking for federal stimulus money for pavement <br />preservation projects, which might allow the more flexible local gas tax dollars to be used to fund O&M <br />services in FY10. The right-of-way use fee on City utilities received guarded support at a lower amount. <br />The second funding strategy set called for was in the form of a comprehensive “road map” for solving the <br />City’s overall transportation funding problems in the long term. The council acknowledged that <br />developing the longer-term solutions, including a potential Street Utility Fee and a potential Street <br />Lighting Fee, would need to involve more public input and buy-in over the coming months. <br /> <br />Financial and/or Resource Considerations <br />Current Budget Outlook <br />Under the most current projections, the Road Fund is expected to generate a $2.3 million annual operating <br />deficit this current year (FY09) and, with no new revenues, that annual deficit would grow to nearly $5 <br />million in the out years of the six-year forecast. In the absence of deliberate action, the fund will deplete <br />all available fund resources and become insolvent sometime in the fall of 2009. On the other hand, a set <br />of $3.8 million ongoing revenue solutions implemented by July 1, 2009, would eliminate the projected <br />future annual operating deficits throughout the forecast period and restore the fund balance to the policy- <br />As an alternative, a minimum of $2.8 million in one-time revenue would be <br />recommended level. <br />needed for FY10 <br />to fully fund the current operations of the Road Fund for one year. <br /> <br />Federal Stimulus Award for Pavement Preservation Projects <br />As part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA), Eugene has been awarded $3.0 million <br />st <br />to be used to fund four pavement preservation projects, including sections of West 1 Avenue, Garfield <br />Street, High Street and Crescent Avenue. These projects will be bid before the end of 2009 and <br />constructed in 2010. These are projects which would not otherwise have been constructed in this time <br />period, had the City been looking to local gas tax monies alone for funding. <br /> <br />City Manager’s FY10 Budget Strategy for the Road Fund <br />The City Manager’s strategy for preserving street O&M services through FY10 employs both program <br />cost reductions and realignments as well as a proposal for a one-time revenue strategy for FY10. <br /> <br /> Z:\CMO\2009 Council Agendas\M090408\S090408B.doc <br /> <br /> <br />