My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item B - Big Box Stores Control
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2004
>
CCAgenda-05/24/04WS
>
Item B - Big Box Stores Control
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:11:12 PM
Creation date
5/20/2004 9:40:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
5/24/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
address wage costs to be competitive with supercenters. In a traditional food retail <br />business, labor cost approaches 15% of sales in an environment where the gross margin <br />(the difference between the cost of merchandise and the sale price) is about 28%. <br />Acknowledging the disparity of wages between supercenters and markets, a zoning code <br />amendment to address the issue of retail wage practice is problematic. Distinguishing <br />uses based upon the wages paid to employees is difficult to advance given the purpose of <br />zoning (impact associated with land use). No better example of this is the self service <br />check out that is beginning to emerge in the retail industry. <br /> <br />Code provisions relating to the national vs. local ownership of retail use is the second <br />issue. My scan of local ordinances did not find an example distinguishing uses on an <br />ownership basis (national vs. local). While from a consumer point of view Jerry's and <br />Home Depot represent different purchase options, they are indistinguishable from an <br />objective zoning impact assessment. <br /> <br />Issue Analysis <br /> <br />In response to the recent editorial by Joan Kleban in the Register Guard, staff categorized <br />the issue of concern as expressed by 77 e-mails received by PDD. While not presented as <br />a scientific analysis, it does present an indication of what is the issue with Wal-Mart. <br /> <br />77 e-mail messages were received between March 29, 2004 and May 5, 2004. The <br />distribution was as follows: <br /> <br /> 12 (16%) Supportive of the Wal-Mart Expansion <br /> 55 (84%) Opposed to the Wal-Mart Expansion <br /> <br />As it relates to the issue of a potential zoning code amendment, the issue cited as the area <br />of concern is particularly significant. Of the 55 opposed, the cause for concern was as <br />follows: <br /> <br /> 29 (45%) Competition with local businesses <br /> 25 (38%) Wages and business practices <br /> 1 (1%) Traffic <br /> 7 (11%) Aesthetics <br /> 3 (5%) None cited <br /> <br />Code Amendment Consequences <br /> <br />A 50,000 square foot limitation on retail square footage has been advanced for <br />consideration by the City Council. Should the Council direct staff to undertake a <br />limitation of this size, it would be necessary to reprioritize the PDD Work Plan recently <br />approved by the City Council. It is offered that the Council should consider the <br />following consequences prior to directing that action: <br /> <br /> 1. What would be the effect of creating a non-conformity for all retail buildings <br />of over 50,000 square feet? <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.