Laserfiche WebLink
average over time. Specific analysis of bond amounts and timing cannot be undertaken <br />until there is a final project list with the expected timing of the spending for each project. <br /> <br />Impact on Debt Policy Limits <br /> <br />The Budget Committee approved revised debt policies in February 2005. At that time, <br />the Committee approved a debt policy limit that states that net direct debt as a percentage <br />of real market value shall be a maximum of 1.0%. <br /> <br />The most recent update of the Debt Capacity Analysis was also prepared as of February <br />2005, with projections of net direct debt outstanding from FY06 through FY11. At that <br />time, it was projected that the City could issue $30 million for PROS projects in FY07 <br />and $70 million for the City Hall replacement project in FY09 within the debt policy <br />limits. Net direct debt outstanding under that scenario would peak in FY09 at 0.9%. <br /> <br />Issuance of approximately $30 million of PROS bonds (or less) within the next six years <br />would, therefore, be consistent with the debt policies. Issuance of the higher amount <br />(Option C for $50 million) over the next six years would potentially constrain the amount <br />of debt capacity that might be needed for City Hall. It is possible, however, to approve a <br />$50 million bond measure, but to only issue the debt when it would result in the City’s <br />net direct debt amount outstanding remaining under the 1.0% of real market value limit. <br />In the February 2005 Debt Capacity Study, for instance, that by FY11, there would be <br />additional debt capacity of about $43 million, even after issuance of $30 million of PROS <br />bonds and $70 million of City Hall bonds. That additional capacity would be created <br />from two factors: (1) growth in real market value; and (2) retirements of existing debt. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />