My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Admin Order 58-94-25
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Administrative Orders
>
1990-94
>
Admin Order 58-94-25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 10:50:15 AM
Creation date
4/7/2009 4:54:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Recorder
CMO_Document_Type
Admin Orders
Document_Date
9/14/1994
Document_Number
58-94-25
CMO_Effective_Date
9/14/1994
Author
Christine Andersen
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />July 22, 1994 <br /> <br />AMAZON PARK DEVELOPMENT PLANNING <br />CRITERIA AND CONSIDERATIONS <br />BEHIND THE <br />PLANNING DECISIONS <br /> <br />The act of planning for how Amazon Park will be developed was <br />essentially an exercise of balancing competing needs for park <br />space within the community. The adopted planning documents that <br />govern in this situation (Oregon Statewide Planning Goals, the <br />Lane County Metropolitan General Plan [Metro Plan], and the <br />Eugene Parks and Recreation Plan) all contain goals and policies <br />that are often, to some extent, in conflict with each other. <br />Briefly, all plans speak to the need to preserve and enhance the <br />community's natural resources, and all plans speak to the need to <br />provide a variety of recreational opportunities in ways that make <br />them accessible to the population. The oral and written input <br />received in the Amazon Park planning process affirmed that those <br />conflicting goals and objectives exist in the community. <br /> <br />Fortunately, there is a natural way these interests sort <br />themselves out: Areas of high natural resource value tend to <br />have not been disturbed at this point because they have been the <br />most costly to access and develop. The areas of low natural <br />resource value include those areas that have been disturbed by <br />past use of the land or grading in conjunction with various <br />projects and park improvements. <br /> <br />The proposed plan generally focuses new development in the <br />disturbed areas, proposes managing other areas for their natural <br />resource value, and suggests opportunities for recreating <br />wetlands in areas that were filled years ago. Not all <br />recreational amenities that were suggested by the public are <br />being included, and not all suggestions for expanding natural <br />resource values are included. <br /> <br />What follows are a series of "findings" that are pertinent to <br />Amazon Park. Following that are a series of discussions about <br />each planning decision, and how the findings have affected some <br />of the planning decisions. <br /> <br />FINDINGS <br /> <br />History: Citizens of Eugene, raising money through the Century <br />Fund, acquired Amazon Park in 1946. Early planners had visions <br />for developing the entire park with greater recreational <br />offerings than are planned today. Before Amazon Creek was <br />engineered for flood control purposes in the late '50's, there <br />was frequent flooding. Some rural development along the west <br />side of Hilyard Street had existed during pre-park days, <br />primarily involving livestock grazing. <br /> <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.