My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Admin Order 58-96-26-F
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Administrative Orders
>
1995-99
>
Admin Order 58-96-26-F
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 10:50:21 AM
Creation date
4/7/2009 5:37:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Recorder
CMO_Document_Type
Admin Orders
Document_Date
1/22/1997
Document_Number
58-96-26-F
CMO_Effective_Date
2/1/1997
Author
Linda Norris
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />the timing of building permit issuance to water quality issues. Costs incurred due to delays <br />in building permit issuance are not relevant to water quality efforts and the erosion program <br />and, therefore, these costs will not be included in the MEP calculation. <br /> <br />Comment 4: Maximum Extent Practicable provision is too complex for single <br />family residential application. <br /> <br />Finding: There are standardized management measures with proven technologies <br />that address most single family applications. Categories ofMEP cost are the same for single <br />family as for other land use types. Calculating costs and determining appropriate technology <br />is fairly straight forward and, therefore, there is no need at this time to differentiate between <br />single family and other uses for MEP purposes. Therefore, there is no need to adjust the rule <br />at this time. <br /> <br />Comment 5: Keep the second sentence ofR-6.645-D.2 in the originalAdministrative <br />Rule version. <br /> <br />Finding: This provision remains in the proposed rule and is now located in R-6.645- <br />D3. Th~r~ i~ !!9 !!~~g tQ t\4jy~t th~ ml~, <br /> <br />Comment 6: Who will monitor nonconstruction activities? <br /> <br />Findin~: The erosion program specifically addresses construction-related impacts. <br />Other City Code provisions will address illicit discharges or nuisance-related issues. <br /> <br />Comment 7: How and to what extent will compliance be monitored? <br /> <br />Finding: Erosion staff will monitor permit holders at specific points in the <br />construction process. Compliance with the outcomes will be assessed at each point in the <br />inspection process. <br /> <br />Comment 8: How will cost for monitoring be paid? <br /> <br />Finding: Monitoring and all other related program costs will be financed through <br />the erosion permit fees. <br /> <br />Comment 9: Don't require building inspectors to enforce this ordinance. <br /> <br />Findine: Building inspectors are not designated as enforcement officers for this <br />program. <br /> <br />Comment 10: The erosion program will increase building permit processing by two <br />weeks. <br /> <br />Erosion Prevention Administrative Rule R-6.645 - 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.