Laserfiche WebLink
House Bill 2385 <br /> <br />Ms. Wilson reported that this bill would prohibit smoking in a vehicle while a person aged 16 and under was <br />also in the vehicle, with a maximum fine of $90 for the first offense, $180 for the second offense, and $360 <br />for any subsequent offense. She said the staff person commenting on the bill was Police Lieutenant Derel <br />Shulz and he recommended a Priority 3 Neutral. She related that he felt that though this was good policy it <br />would be difficult to enforce. She stated that Councilor Taylor had moved to adopt a Priority 3 Support for <br />the bill and her motion died for lack of a second. She noted that the bill had received a hearing but had not <br />yet received a work session. She also noted that the Oregon Police Association had agreed that the law <br />would be difficult to enforce, but their position was that as with the seatbelt law there would be a high rate <br />of people who would follow the law simply because it was the law. <br /> <br />House Bill 2239 <br /> <br />Ms. Wilson stated that the bill would fill any loophole that now did not allow for a fine if a person refused a <br />blood or urine test under the Motorists Implied Consent Law. She said there currently was a fine for <br />refusing to take a breathalyzer test. She related that Policy Analyst for the Eugene Police Department, <br />Ellwood Cushman, had reviewed the bill and recommended adopting a Priority 3 Support. Councilor Taylor <br />had moved to change this to a Priority 3 Oppose and this had resulted in a 2:1 vote. She noted that the bill <br />had come from the Governor’s Task Force on DUII and the Mothers Against Drunk Driving had testified in <br />support of it. She said the only opposition to the bill had come from the Oregon Criminal Defense Lawyers <br />Association, which had indicated that they took no issue with the refusal of the urine test but they did have <br />an issue with requiring blood testing. She related that their feeling was that people in the hospital might not <br />be in the best condition to give that type of consent. She said the Oregon State Police (OSP) had reported <br />that in the past year there had been 215 blood test refusals and 415 urine test refusals. She added that the <br />OSP noted that criminal defense lawyers often recommended to clients that they refuse those tests and most <br />of the people being asked to provide these tests were repeat offenders. <br /> <br />House Bill 2384 <br /> <br />Ms. Wilson said this bill would require the Oregon Justice Commission to administer collaboration grants <br />for local Public Safety Coordinating Councils (PSCCs). She explained that it would require them to <br />administer the grants to encourage collaboration between local agencies and organizations involved in the <br />criminal justice system, noting that the grants would not exceed $100,000. She related that to qualify there <br />would have to be an inter-agency project that would utilize a collaborative approach to solve a problem of <br />local public safety concerns. She said the bill had been sponsored by Representative Nancy Nathanson. <br />The staff person providing the recommendation had been Police Chief Pete Kerns and he recommended a <br />Priority 3 Support. She reported that Councilor Taylor had moved to change this to Priority 3 Oppose and <br />her motion had died for lack of a second. She noted that there had not been a hearing for the bill yet. <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka, seconded by Councilor Clark, moved to ratify the Intergovernmental <br />Relations Committee’s unanimous actions on bills and approval of staff recommendations <br />in the January 28, and February 4, 2009, Intergovernmental Relations Bill Reports for bills <br />not pulled for discussion at those meetings. Roll call vote; the motion passed unanimously, <br />8:0. <br /> <br />Councilor Poling expressed a preference for addressing the bills one at a time in future council meetings, <br />rather than having Ms. Wilson highlight them all. He also asked that she explain what the levels of priority <br />meant. <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council February 9, 2009 Page 6 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />