Laserfiche WebLink
term issues that would have very damaging long term consequences. A simple majority <br />to increase the permament is democratic and should be our objective. <br />SJR 0036 <br />Relating Clause: Proposing amendment to Oregon Constitution relating to valuation of property. <br />Title: <br />Proposes amendment to Oregon Constitution creating minimum assessed value for <br />property taxation equal to 50 percent of real market value and maximum assessed value <br />for property taxation equal to 75 percent of real market value. Changes exception <br />valuation of property to 75 percent of real market value. Adds to classes of property <br />subject to exception valuation property sold or transferred to new owner. <br /> Refers proposed amendment to people for their approval or rejection at next regular <br />general election. <br />Sponsored by: COMMITTEE ON FINANCE AND REVENUE <br />URL:http://www.leg.state.or.us/09reg/measpdf/sjr1.dir/sjr0036.intro.pdf <br />ContactRespondentDept Updated Priority Policy Poli Numb Recommendation <br />Larry Hill Larry Hill CS-FIN 3/24/2009 Pri 2 Yes YesII. A1 Oppose <br />Comments: <br />SJRs 35, 36 and 37 are proposed Oregon Constitutional amendments with different <br />approaches to the problem of the widening gap between assesed property valuse and <br />real market values. The measures were introduced by the Senate Committee on Finance <br />and Revenue in order to facilitate a discussion on the general issue. I recommend the <br />City participate in the discussion aand urge amendments to whatever measure advances. <br />Specific to SJR 36, the measure would create a minimum assesed value of 50% of real <br />market value. This would have little effect on the City of Eugene. It would also set <br />assessed value at 75% of real market value when a property is improved, rezoned, and <br />so forth, with the addition of an adjustment to 75% of real market value upon sale. <br />Specific to SJR 37, the measure would set assessed value at 75% of real market value <br />rather than at thr changed property ratio when a property is improved, rezoned, or is <br />otherwise classified as having exceptions value. In addition the bill would set assessed <br />value at 75% of real market value upon sale or transfer of property. Right now the <br />changed property ratio for a category of property determined the assessed value of a <br />changed or exceptions value property. This is the average ratio of assessed value to real <br />market value for a property category. in Eugene the changed property ratio varies <br />between 100% for industrial property to 58% for residential property to 46% for <br />recreational property. Switching to a flat 75% rather than the current scale of changed <br />property ratios would increase the assessed value for residential and most changed <br />properties, but lower the assessed value for industrial and some other changed <br />properties. This proposal as introduced could be beneficial to local governments but <br />needs a much closer look. However, it appears the measure would also cap assessed <br />value at 75% of real market value, rather than at the current 100%. This would put many <br />more properties in the City of Eugene into compression and reduce tax revenue <br />unacceptably. This last provision should be strongly opposed. <br />SJR 0037 <br />Relating Clause: Proposing amendment to Oregon Constitution relating to valuation of property. <br />Title: Proposes amendment to Oregon Constitution changing exception valuation of property to <br />75 percent of real market value. Adds to classes of property subject to exception <br />valuation property sold or transferred to new owner. <br /> Refers proposed amendment to people for their approval or rejection at next regular <br />general election. <br />Sponsored by: COMMITTEE ON FINANCE AND REVENUE <br />URL:http://www.leg.state.or.us/09reg/measpdf/sjr1.dir/sjr0037.intro.pdf <br />59 <br /> <br />