Item 3: Discuss and Approve Non-Unanimous IGR Positions

Home Browse Search

certain entities when the information is to be used “in connection with a proceeding in any court, government agency or regulatory body.” We believe that the language of the third exception, contained in page 7, lines 4-9, of the bill is somewhat ambiguous, and possibly subject to a fairly broad interpretation. We would support eliminating this section or further restricting its language, but remain in support of the bill even if this is not done. It is hard to think of a legitimate reason why, other than for the exceptions listed, any person or entity would need the identity of individuals with a CHL. Aggregate data (such as how many such licenses were issued in particular cities or counties) would still be available for those interested in such data. But this bill would protect the identity of the individuals holding a CHL. Most individuals who have a CHL have procured one because of personal safety concerns. As part of the application, they obviously have to provide such personal information as their name and address to the county. Release of this information could result in harm to these individuals in at least two ways: First, a list of individuals with a CHL would provide a potential burglar with a list of addresses where there is certainly at least one handgun on the property that s/he could steal. Second, it provides a person intending to victimize a person a way to learn whether s/he likely is armed. Although some might argue that this could serve as a deterrent, it could equally well ensure that the criminal arms himself/herself, and uses a higher level of pre-emptive force against the victim, increasing the likelihood of serious injury or death to the victim. In addition, if information regarding who has a CHL is publicly available, some individuals who might otherwise obtain a CHL, but do not want that fact known, may opt to take their chances by carrying a concealed firearm without a license, thus circumventing the screening process that currently takes place during the licensing process. On balance, we believe that the privacy rights of CHL holders, and their safety, far outweigh any interest that might accrue from their individual identities being publicly available. HB 2770 Relating Clause: Relating to registration plates for persons with disabilities. Title: Directs Department of Transportation to design and issue registration plate that grants parking privileges to qualifying person with disability. Sponsored by: Representative C EDWARDS; Representative GREENLICK, Senators DINGFELDER, ROSENBAUM (at the request of Rodney Metzger) URL:http://www.leg.state.or.us/09reg/measpdf/hb2700.dir/hb2770.intro.pdf ContactRespondentDept Updated Priority Policy Poli Numb Recommendation Eric Jones Eric Jones PW-ADM 2/27/2009 Pri 3 Oppose Comments: Parking Manager Jeff Petry makes a good point, enough so that I am inclined to recommend a priority 3 oppose position (vs a drop). I note that Rep. Edwards is a co- sponsor. ContactRespondentDept Updated Priority Policy Poli Numb Recommendation Jeff Petry Jeff Petry PDD-ADM 2/25/2009 Pri 3 Oppose Comments: Disabled permit should be with the individual not the vehicle. HB 2776 Relating Clause: Relating to public employee retirement. 8