My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 3: Discuss and Approve Non-Unanimous IGR Positions
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2009
>
CC Agenda - 04/13/09 Meeting
>
Item 3: Discuss and Approve Non-Unanimous IGR Positions
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:43:15 PM
Creation date
4/10/2009 12:43:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
4/13/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
122
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The City of Eugene should oppose HB 2952 <br />ContactRespondentDept Updated Priority Policy Poli Numb Recommendation <br />Mark Whitmill PDD-BPS 3/16/2009 Pri 3 Yes YesIV. A Oppose <br />Comments: <br />I agree with Ethan's comments. <br />HB 2953 <br />Relating Clause: Relating to bidding requirements for public improvement contracts. <br />Title: Provides that contracting agency may reject bid for public improvement contract if bidder <br />does not demonstrate that bidder is responsible. Provides that bidder must demonstrate <br />responsibility by showing that bidder has licenses that businesses and service <br />Sponsored by: COMMITTEE ON BUSINESS AND LABOR <br />URL:http://www.leg.state.or.us/09reg/measpdf/hb2900.dir/hb2953.intro.pdf <br />ContactRespondentDept Updated Priority Policy Poli Numb Recommendation <br />Mia Cariaga CS-FIN 3/11/2009 Pri 3 VIII. B Support <br />Comments: <br />Agree with Mike, language clean up. <br />ContactRespondentDept Updated Priority Policy Poli Numb Recommendation <br />Mike Penwell Mike Penwell CS-FAC 3/6/2009 Pri 3 Yes YesVIII. B Support <br />Comments: <br />This bill tightens up some of the wording relating to responsible bidders and appropriate <br />licenses. It is probably worth supporting even though it doesn't really change the intent of <br />any portion of ORS 279. Very low priority, however. <br />ContactRespondentDept Updated Priority Policy Poli Numb Recommendation <br />Lauren Sommers ATTNY 3/17/2009 Pri 3 Yes YesVIII. B Support <br />Comments: <br />Agree with comments from Mike, Paul and Mia. Most of the changes seem to be intended <br />to clean up the language of the affected statutes. The bill would shift the burden to the <br />bidder to demonstrate responsibility. In order to be considered responsible the bill <br />requires that a bidder demonstrate that the bidder holds current licenses necessary to <br />undertake the work and holds insurance in amounts the City requires in the solicitation <br />document. <br />ContactRespondentDept Updated Priority Policy Poli Numb Recommendation <br />Paul Klope PWE 3/12/2009 Pri 3 Yes YesVIII. B Support <br />Comments: <br />I agree with Mike also. Most of the bill is housekeeping and wordsmithing. However, in <br />addition the bill shifts the responsibility from the public agency to determine if the bidder <br />is responsible to requiring the bidder to demonstrate that it is responsible. No impact to <br />the City. <br />HB 2955 <br />Relating Clause: Relating to retainage in connection with public improvement contracts <br />Title: Permits contracting agency to accept certain instruments from contractor in lieu of <br />moneys held as retainage in connection with public improvement contracts and permits <br />contractor to accept similar instruments from subcontractor. <br />Sponsored by: COMMITTEE ON BUSINESS AND LABOR <br />URL:http://www.leg.state.or.us/09reg/measpdf/hb2900.dir/hb2955.intro.pdf <br />ContactRespondentDept Updated Priority Policy Poli Numb Recommendation <br />Mike Penwell Mike Penwell CS-FAC 3/23/2009 Pri 3 Yes YesVIII. B Oppose <br />Comments: <br />I agree with the comments of Paul Klope and Twyla Miller. This bill should be opposed <br />unless amended. <br />ContactRespondentDept Updated Priority Policy Poli Numb Recommendation <br />13 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.