Laserfiche WebLink
preceding the ILEC petition for exemption. This is not justified in a year when the Oregon <br />Department of Justice issued its report that Telecommunications Complaints rank No 1 in <br />the Oregon Attorney Generals' Consumer Complaint list. <br />http://www.doj.state.or.us/releases/pdf/top10_consumer_complaints_2009_rpt.pdf. <br />Telecom Program straff are working with other Oregon local governments to learn more <br />about HB 3036 and staff will inform the IGR Committee if our recommended position <br />should be changed. <br />HB 3037 <br />Relating Clause: Relating to paint stewardship. <br />Title: Creates pilot program for paint stewardship. Directs manufacturers of paint to create <br />program. Requires paint manufacturers to report to Director of Department of <br />Environmental Quality. <br /> Sunsets January 2, 2014. <br />Sponsored by: COMMITTEE ON SUSTAINABILITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT <br />URL:http://www.leg.state.or.us/09reg/measpdf/hb3000.dir/hb3037.intro.pdf <br />ContactRespondentDept Updated Priority Policy Poli Numb Recommendation <br />Ethan Nelson PDD-BPS 3/16/2009 Pri 3 Yes YesVII. A4 Support <br />Comments: <br />HB 3037 creates a pilot product stewardship program for architectural grade paint in <br />Oregon. The program is set up to drive private industry to evaluate and establish a <br />lifecycle product management process, but sunset by 2014. This bill is part of the suite of <br />product stewardship bills this session and is supported by Council Policy VII A4c. <br />Currently, there is no ban in Oregon on disposing of household hazardous waste <br />(including architectural paint) into landfills. Despite a lack of a ban, solid waste <br />management authorities strive to remove this stream from the landfill due the negative <br />environmental impacts of solvents in the leachate. For example, Lane County Solid <br />Waste manages the Glenwood Transfer Station voluntary hazardous waste drop-off <br />program. This program is funded through disposal fees and moves the end of life <br />management of the product from the producer to a public agency. The cost for a public <br />agency to manage the end of life process is far higher than if the paint industry <br />maintained a take-back program. <br />The City of Eugene should support HB 3037. <br />HB 3040 <br />Relating Clause: Relating to utility programs to reduce greenhouse gases. <br />Title: Requires Public Utility Commission to approve rate changes to compensate public <br />utilities for programs and projects that reduce greenhouse gases. <br />Sponsored by: COMMITTEE ON SUSTAINABILITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT <br />URL:http://www.leg.state.or.us/09reg/measpdf/hb3000.dir/hb3040.intro.pdf <br />ContactRespondentDept Updated Priority Policy Poli Numb Recommendation <br />Ethan Nelson PDD-BPS 3/16/2009 Pri 1 Yes YesVII. A1 Oppose <br />Comments: <br />HB 3040 requests the Public Utility Commission to allow public utilities to increase rates <br />to offset increased greenhouse gas mitigation costs (such as carbon tax or cap and trade <br />scenarios). Also requests the PUC to allow companies to earn a reasonable rate of <br />return on capital investments for greenhouse gas mitigation measures. <br />This bill would directly affect Eugene area natural gas customers. Rather than allow the <br />PUC to identify what capital investments are allowable and the rates of return, this bill <br />legislates in favor of the utilities without opportunity for deliberation by the PUC. The <br />PUC is the policy body that should make these determinations, not legislature. <br />The City of Eugene should oppose this bill. <br />22 <br /> <br />