Laserfiche WebLink
Sponsored by: COMMITTEE ON BUSINESS AND LABOR <br />URL:http://www.leg.state.or.us/09reg/measpdf/hb3100.dir/hb3131.intro.pdf <br />ContactRespondentDept Updated Priority Policy Poli Numb Recommendation <br />Susan Mullett Susan Mullett CS-HRRS 3/13/2009 Pri 3 Oppose <br />Comments: <br />Has some similarity to HB 2546 except the word "permanent" has been removed from <br />before replacement worker. This bill could have a negative impact for the City if in a strike <br />situation on how service and business needs would be meet if replacement workers <br />could not be hired during the duration of a strike. <br />HB 3136 <br />Relating Clause: Relating to tow vehicles. <br />Title: Exempts person who operates tow vehicle from liability if person operates tow vehicle at <br />direction of police officer, firefighter or person providing ambulance services. <br />Sponsored by: COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION (at the request of Northwest Auto Trades <br />Association) <br />URL:http://www.leg.state.or.us/09reg/measpdf/hb3100.dir/hb3136.intro.pdf <br />ContactRespondentDept Updated Priority Policy Poli Numb Recommendation <br />Glen Potter Glen Potter EFD 3/16/2009 Pri 3 No No Oppose <br />Comments: <br />We have not seen many examples of damaged vehicles when towed at the direction of <br />fire crews, and do not believe an examption from liability is justified. <br />ContactRespondentDept Updated Priority Policy Poli Numb Recommendation <br /> E. Cushman EPD-ADM 3/18/2009 Pri 3 No No Oppose <br />Comments: <br />We oppose this bill, which would exempt a tow vehicle operator from liability for damage <br />to a vehicle if the vehicle is being towed at the direction of police, fire, or EMS personnel. <br />We believe that it is bad public policy to allow a "carte blanche" exemption from liability <br />for tow operators. The way this bill is worded, the exemption would apply even if the tow <br />vehicle operator was grossly negligent in towing the vehicle. In addition, we believe there <br />is a potential for increased liability to the City, at least in having to defend claims. If the <br />owner of the damaged vehicle cannot make a claim against the tow company, s/he will <br />no doubt try to make a claim against the jurisdiction employing the police officer, <br />firefighter, or paramedic who requested the tow. And, the way this bill is worded, it would <br />apply even if the public employee was simply being a conduit for a request from a private <br />person (e.g., police officer assisting a stalled motorist who relayed a request for a tow <br />truck made by the motorist). <br />HB 3137 <br />Relating Clause: Relating to transportation; declaring an emergency. <br />Title: Repeals dedication of specified moneys to state highway modernization program. <br />Establishes priorities for highway projects. Increases allocation of State Highway Fund <br />moneys for footpaths and bicycle trails. Declares emergency, effective July 1, 2009. <br />Sponsored by: COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION <br />URL:http://www.leg.state.or.us/09reg/measpdf/hb3100.dir/hb3137.intro.pdf <br />ContactRespondentDept Updated Priority Policy Poli Numb Recommendation <br />Eric Jones Eric Jones PW-ADM 3/11/2009 Pri 1 Yes YesIII. A Support <br />Comments: <br />This bill codifies a longstanding city of Eugene policy that places the highest priority for <br />flexible transportation funding on the operation, maintenance and preservation of the <br />existing transportation system. It should be supported vigorously. <br />Essentially, this bill repeals ORS 366.507, which gave the highest priority for much of <br />state highway spending "to establish and operate a state modernization program for <br />29 <br /> <br />