Laserfiche WebLink
<br />undeveloped condition at a location on the east side of Gilham Elementary <br />School. Through a public planning process that drew heavily from families with <br />children attending Gilham School, some school staff, and several immediate <br />neighbors, a park development plan was created last summer that has enthusiastic <br />support. The plan also covers additional School District 4J land which abuts the <br />park." <br /> <br />Note: At this time in 1997, no funding existed for the development of the park as <br />shown on the 1996 Development Plan. Even though the passage of the Parks and <br />Open Space bond measure in November of 1998 did not include funding <br />earmarked to develop Gilham Park, the Park System Development Fund <br />continued to grow during that period, and in 2000 funds were allocated towards <br />the development of the park. <br /> <br />H. Due to the elapsed time of approximately 4 years since the last public meeting, the <br />next step was to reaffirm the direction given on the 1996' development plan by <br />holding another public meeting. <br /> <br />Public Review W orkshoo - July 26. 2000 at Gilham School <br /> <br />The 1996 Schematic Development Plan was used to continue discussion with the public on how <br />Gilham Park should be developed. There were 17 people in attendance, including 4J teacher <br />Laurie McCaskill, and Mayor Torrey. <br /> <br />Comments and Concerns from Workshop and Written Testimony: <br /> <br />The use of natives was urged for the street tree planting. Also, using eco-Iawn was urged for the <br />curb planting strip. <br />The issue of how the maintenance would be handled for the 4J portion of the park was raised, plus <br />the implied liability and use of the amphitheater, which was shown near the school building. <br />The need for a restroom, its 10caton, screening, lockable doors, and proximity to other park uses <br />was debated. Half of the people thought a restroom was necessary, especially for the elderly and <br />young children, others were concerned about undesirable activities it might cause. <br />The park should remain largely natural, friendly, open and free flowing. <br />The playground should be mainly for 2-5 year olds. <br />~ Some of the existing school play equipment is old and there is no money for replacement. <br />A bike rack is needed. <br />The park entrance should be on the east side of the park. <br />The park should have a natural resource zone...native plants, trees, flowers, roses. <br />A discussion occurred over paving or not paving the paths and walks. There was an understanding <br />of accessibility and maintenance needs, but still a desire for some natural walk ways. <br />There was a general concensis that a basketball court should not be built at this park. Especially <br />since basketball exists at Cal Young School. <br />If exercise equipment is installed, do it at different locations in the park. <br />In the playfield, plant trees as goal posts. <br />Community plots for gardening. <br /> <br />Gilham Park Admin Approval <br /> <br />Page 4 <br />