My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Admin Order 58-02-25-F
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Administrative Orders
>
2002
>
Admin Order 58-02-25-F
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 10:48:30 AM
Creation date
4/10/2009 4:24:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Recorder
CMO_Document_Type
Admin Orders
Document_Date
3/31/2002
Document_Number
58-02-25-F
CMO_Effective_Date
5/1/2002
Author
James R. Carlson
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />3. Report Content. <br /> <br />3.1 Introduction. Must include the same information required in a Levell report. <br /> <br />3.2 Prol ect Location and Description. Must include the same information required <br />in a Level 1 report. <br /> <br />3.3 Site Investigation. <br />3.3.1 Development of the investigation. (Include who specified it and why <br />the investigation was done in the manner it was done.) <br />3.3.2 Scope of field work. (Include how many test pits/test borings were <br />made, what type, and where.) <br />3.3.3 Drilling, sampling, and field testing program and methods; <br />ASTM/ AASHTO references. <br />3.3.4 Laboratory testing program (samples tested; procedures used, ASTM <br />references). <br />3.3.5 Discussion ofunusual conditions encountered during field drilling and <br />sampling. <br /> <br />3.4 Analysis of Site Investigation Data. <br />3.4.1 Summary of observed subsurface profile (stratigraphy); discussion of <br />soil and rock layers and deposits encountered in the subsurface investigation; index <br />properties and classifications. <br />3.4.2 Comparison of developed soil profile to geologic setting described in <br />previous section, including a discussion of similarities and differences. <br />3.4.3 Discussion of each of the potential geologic-natural hazards observed <br />at the development site; location, magnitude, time effects, possible effects on the <br />structure or facility. <br />3.4.4 Discussion of laboratory test results, and description of potentially <br />expansive soils, organic deposits, loose sands, and any areas of potential or existing <br />instability. <br />3.4.5 Discussion of anticipated groundwater conditions that may effect the <br />site development and/or project, and discussion of effects of grading on infiltration <br />of water. <br /> <br />3.5 <br />following: <br /> <br />Conclusions. Include the same requirements required in a Level 1 and the <br /> <br />3.5.1 Suggested methods for dealing with the potential geologic-natural <br />hazards; qualitative advice to design engineers or architects. <br />3.5.2 Clear reference to empirical, published or unpublished, minimum <br />design standards or procedures for the design of elements of the structure or facility, <br />which are based solely on the index properties of supporting soil and/or rock units. <br />Recommendations for design and construction shall be based on the Qualified <br />Registered Professional's judgment, combined with experience. <br />3.5.3 Expectations concerning consolidation or settlement. <br />3.5.4 Clear reference of groundwater elevations and its impact on the <br />constructed development and construction activities and necessary mitigation <br />measures. <br /> <br />3.6 Appendices and Graphic Presentations. Shall meet the same requirements <br /> <br />Administrative Order - 17 <br />R:\ADMINORD\RULES\03 geotech2ao. wpd(03/26/03) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.