My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Admin Order 53-93-36-F
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Administrative Orders
>
1990-94
>
Admin Order 53-93-36-F
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 10:47:35 AM
Creation date
4/14/2009 5:06:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Recorder
CMO_Document_Type
Admin Orders
Document_Date
3/10/1994
Document_Number
53-93-36-F
CMO_Effective_Date
3/10/1994
Author
Micheal D. Gleason
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 53-93-36F <br />of the <br />City Manager of the City of Eugene <br /> <br />AMENDING FEES FOR SIDEWALK COMMERCE <br />AND REPEALING PRIOR ORDERS <br /> <br />The City Manager of the City of Eugene finds as follows: <br /> <br />A. Section 2.020 of the Eugene, Code, 1971 authorizes the City Manager to <br />determine and set fees and charges to be i~posed by the City for services, goods, use of <br />municipal property, and licenses and permits. <br /> <br />B. In accordance with the procedures set forth therein, on December 23, 1993 <br />I notified the Mayor and City Council and currently licensed sidewalk vendors that I <br />intended to amend some of the fees previously established for the City's sidewalk vending <br />application and license programs. The Notice was also posted at two locations at City Hall <br />on December 25, 1993, and made available for inspection by interested persons at the offices <br />of the City's Planning & Development Department, Building & Permit Services Division, 244 <br />East Broadway, Eugene, Oregon 97401. The Notice provided that written comments would <br />be received thereon for a period of 15 days from the first date of posting. <br /> <br />C. The following written comments were received, to which I make the following <br />specific findings: <br /> <br />Comments: Three persons suggested that fees, particularly those for peddlers, <br />should be reduced or eliminated. A fourth person suggested that fees be increased <br />to an amount sufficient to make it prohibitive for peddlers. Another individual felt <br />that the proposed fees might be too low, and that the City should set them in an <br />amount that would recover all costs. One respondent felt a particular rule provision <br />would be too expensive for compliance by peddlers, and another respondent felt the <br />rule permitted unfair competition vis a vis building merchants, and that the vendors <br />pay "nearly nothing" to operate. <br /> <br />Findin2s: In 1985 the City Council approved an ordinance allowing sidewalk <br />vending and established fees in connection with the licensing program. Requirements <br />for the program were modified by Council Ordinance in 1993. The Council has <br />expressed to City staff that vending from carts and by peddlers on an on-going and <br />short-term basis should be allowed. The Council has also directed that regulations <br />be developed that address health, safety and competition, and that fees be established <br />in a manner and amount sufficient to recover the costs of administering the program <br />from the beneficiaries of thosed services. <br /> <br />In response to the comments received, staff analyzed the process required to <br />review vending applications and issue licenses and recommended revisions to the <br />proposed fees. The fee schedule as recommended by staff differentiates between <br /> <br />Administrative Order - 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.