Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Poling also supported the staff recommendation. <br />Ms. Taylor moved to change the City’s position on the bill to Support. The motion died <br />for lack of a second. <br />Mayor Piercy suggested that the bill could be amended to address any concerns the City might have. She <br />did not think, for example, it was intended to address summer employees. Ms. Wilson observed that the <br />bill applied to temporary employees, seasonal employees, and even limited duration employees hired <br />under grants for special projects. Mayor Piercy said that those categories could be eliminated while the <br />“permanent temporary employees” of concern to Ms. Taylor could be addressed. <br />Ms. Taylor believed student workers were a totally different matter from temporary workers and asked that <br />Ms. Wilson convey that message to Representative Paul Holvey, a sponsor of the bill. <br />SB 626 <br />Ms. Wilson said the bill would increase the fee for screening interviews of a person convicted of driving <br />under the influence of intoxicants. Staff recommended a Position of Priority 2, Support. She reported that <br />currently, an individual found guilty of driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII) was required to <br />go through a screening process to determine what type of treatment was in order. The City used to use the <br />Lane County Mental Health Department to do the screening, but it no longer performed that function. <br />Responding to a question from Ms. Taylor, Ms. Wilson said the person found guilty of DUII paid the fee. <br />Ms. Taylor thought that added fee a harsh punishment on top of the other penalties one found guilty of <br />DUII received. <br />Ms. Ortiz expressed concern that the cost of the screening interview was going up as she thought it might <br />make someone less inclined to go through the process. She noted that Lane County Mental Health used its <br />own staff to do the screening, which included a psychological assessment, and she hoped that the City <br />could find someone equally qualified. She acknowledged the expense of the process. <br />Responding to a question from Mr. Poling, Ms. Wilson clarified that the screening interview fee would be <br />increased statewide from $150 to $250 in response to provider concerns that the fee was inadequate. <br />The committee made no change to the staff position. <br />. <br />SB 532 <br />Ms. Wilson said the bill would direct the Department of Justice (DOJ) to distribute funding to local <br />governments for methamphetamine and property crime prevention. Captain Tilby recommended a position <br />of Priority 2, Support, and the Mr. Hill recommended a position of Monitor due to the financial impact of <br />the proposed legislation. <br />Captain Tilby explained his recommendation to support the bill, saying that property crime was Eugene’s <br />major crime problem. He anticipated that any allocations would be broadly disseminated for necessary <br />prevention, enforcement, and treatment options. He commended the concept behind the bill and added that <br />it provided money the City would not find locally, and a lack of such funding hampered the City’s ability <br />to fight property crimes. <br />Mr. Hill explained his position, saying he considered that the bill was extremely ambitious because it <br />requested $36 million in new spending from a State budget under considerable pressure and was sponsored <br />MINUTES—Council Committee on Intergovernmental Relations March 11, 2009 Page 3 <br />