My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 2F: Ratification of IGR Committee Actions
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2009
>
CC Agenda - 04/27/09 Meeting
>
Item 2F: Ratification of IGR Committee Actions
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:41:41 PM
Creation date
4/24/2009 11:14:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
4/27/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
tion passed unanimously, 3:0. <br />House Current Resolution 6 <br />Ms. Wilson said the resolution would honor University of Oregon Dave Frohnmayer for his many years of <br />service to the State in a variety of capacities. The resolution was sponsored by all members of the Lane <br />County delegation. <br />Mr. Poling, seconded by Ms. Ortiz, moved to support the resolution. The motion passed <br />unanimously, 3:0 <br />Formation of a Lane County Area Commission on Transportation <br />The committee reconsidered its position on the formation of a local ACT. Mayor Piercy said that she did <br />not think the City should take a position on the formation of such a body without further consultation with <br />its intergovernmental partners. Ms. Wilson said there was a letter being circulated by Mayor Piercy and <br />Springfield Mayor Sid Leiken asking the Lane Board of County Commissioners to engage the appropriate <br />partners in a discussion of the issue. Mr. Poling asked about Springfield’s position about the proposal. <br />Ms. Wilson indicated Springfield had not taken a formal position. <br />Responding to a question from Ms. Taylor, Ms. Wilson said the City’s position on the bill was Priority 1, <br />Support, which had the appearance of making the bill look like Eugene’s bill. <br />Ms. Wilson suggested that the City could monitor the bill. She also said the City could ask that a hearing <br />not be held. <br />Mr. Poling supported changing the City’s position to monitor pending more local discussion. Ms. Taylor <br />was willing to support that but was not willing to ask the legislature to not hold a hearing. Ms. Wilson <br />believed the Board of County Commissioners might make that request. <br />Mayor Piercy reported that members of the County commissioners had indicated an interest in holding a <br />local conversation about forming an ACT. She said that Mayor Leiken also indicated interest in a local <br />discussion. She preferred that local problems be processed at the local level when possible to encourage <br />collegial relationships between the local governments. <br />Ms. Taylor supported a local ACT but did not object to monitoring the bill. <br />Ms. Ortiz, seconded by Mr. Poling, moved to monitor legislation related to the formation <br />of a Lane County ACT. The motion passed unanimously, 3:0. <br />Mr. Poling, seconded by Ms. Ortiz, moved to adopt the staff recommendation for priorities <br />and recommendations for all bills that were not pulled for discussion on this meeting and <br />all bills that were discussed and acted upon at this meeting. The motion passed unanim- <br />ously, 3:0. <br />5. OTREC Abstract <br />Ms. Wilson noted that the deadline for applying for the OTREC grant was March 20 but the responsible <br />staff person was out of town and had not yet prepared a memorandum on the grant. <br />MINUTES—Council Committee on Intergovernmental Relations March 11, 2009 Page 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.