Laserfiche WebLink
SB 0665 <br />Relating to employment practices <br />Relating Clause: <br /> Permits administration of polygraph examination to police officer applicants and reserve <br />Title: <br />officer applicants. Provides that decision by employer to disqualify applicant solely on <br />basis of polygraph examination is unlawful employment practice. <br /> COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY <br />Sponsored by: <br />http://www.leg.state.or.us/09reg/measpdf/sb0600.dir/sb0665.intro.pdf <br />URL: <br />ContactRespondentDept Updated Priority Policy Poli Numb Recommendation <br />E. Cushman S. Swenson EPD-ADM 3/10/2009 Pri 2 Yes YesV. C9 Support <br />Comments: <br />We strongly support this bill, which would allow the use of the polygraph as part of the <br />hiring process for police officers and reserve police officers. This is the subject of <br />Legislative Policy V.C.9. <br />Because of the significant authority vested in police officers, it is important to hire the best <br />candidates, and extremely important that unsuitable applicants be eliminated during the <br />hiring process. To accomplish this task, it is important to use every tool at our disposal. <br />Oregon law currently prohibits the use of the polygraph during the police officer hiring <br />process, although many other states use the polygraph as a standard part of the hiring <br />process, and some (such as Washington) actually require it. To not be able to avail <br />ourselves of this tool deprives us of a significant means to learn if an applicant is being <br />untruthful about some of the information s/he has provided. <br />The bill contains protections which limit the use of the polygraph solely to hiring police <br />officers and reserve police officers. The bill does not otherwise change the current <br />prohibition against using the polygraph for any other aspect of employment, such as <br />promotion or internal investigations. It also prohibits disqualifying an applicant solely on <br />the basis of a polygraph examination. <br />SB 0698 <br />Relating to thermal field sanitation <br />Relating Clause: <br /> Changes 'field burning' and 'open field burning' to 'thermal field sanitation' for provisions <br />Title: <br />relating to air quality. Reduces amount of acreage allowed to be propane flamed. <br /> Senator FERRIOLI <br />Sponsored by: <br />http://www.leg.state.or.us/09reg/measpdf/sb0600.dir/sb0698.intro.pdf <br />URL: <br />ContactRespondentDept Updated Priority Policy Poli Numb Recommendation <br />Eric Wold Eric Wold PW-POS 3/9/2009 Pri 1 Yes YesVII. A2 Monitor <br />Comments: <br />SB 698 is the third bill introduced this session that addresses the topic of "field burning". <br />The other two, related bills were introduced by the Governor and Representative Holvey <br />(and both of these bills have provisions to eliminate field burning within 0-2 years). <br />The main intent of SB 698 is to change all references to "open field burning" and "field <br />burning" to the term "thermal field sanitation". I do not fully understand the motivation for <br />this change or the implications of this change. It seems like this change may have <br />broader implications than is immediately apparent from the bill. I am looking for the City's <br />IGR staff to follow-up with people in Salem on whether this change has other <br />implications. <br />There are no provisions in this bill to reduce the acreage of allowed, annual field burning. <br />SB 0800 <br />Relating to the pesticide use reporting system; declaring an emergency. <br />Relating Clause: <br /> Eliminates sunset for pesticide use reporting system. Reduces size of identifying <br />Title: <br />hydrologic unit to be used when reporting pesticide use. Declares emergency, effective <br />on passage. <br />9 <br />