Laserfiche WebLink
sustainable. He had come to believe, however, that growth of a community and the growth of people getting together <br />and interacting was sustainable. He believed this was the type of growth that was important for the council to <br />support. He added that he bicycled from Springfield to Eugene every day. He said without bicycle lanes he would <br />not be doing so. He supported inclusion of bicycle lanes in the Friendly Street project. <br /> <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy closed the Public Forum. <br /> <br />Councilor Clark thanked the people for coming. He asked City Engineer, Mark Schoening, to come forward to <br />respond to a question. He noted that Mr. Schoening, Public Works Director, Kurt Corey, and several other staff <br />people had been very helpful to the people in Ward 5 with a project much like the Crest Drive area, also a street that <br />had not been improved to city standards. He recalled that the process was complex for citizens to vote on whether or <br />not they wanted to upgrade their street. He asked when the vote to upgrade Crest Drive had taken place and how <br />long the vote was “good for.” <br /> <br />Mr. Schoening explained that there were two ways that a Local Improvement District (LID) could be initiated: the <br />property owners could come together and initiate it or the City Council could initiate the project. He related that the <br />council had initiated the Crest/Storey/Friendly project, the Chad Drive project, and the Maple/Elmira project of <br />which Councilor Clark was speaking. <br /> <br />Councilor Clark asked when the projects had been initiated. Mr. Schoening replied that they had all been initiated in <br />the past three years through the budget process. He said before a contract was awarded to initiate construction on <br />any of the three projects there would be a public hearing before the Hearings Official. He stated that if the people <br />who would pay for 50 percent or more of the assessed cost remonstrated against the project, it would be heard by the <br />City Council. He added that a two-thirds majority of the council was then required to move a project forward. <br /> <br />In response to a follow-up question from Councilor Clark, Mr. Schoening stated that the hearings for all three of the <br />projects were scheduled for some time in April. Councilor Clark wanted to ensure that the people who would be <br />assessed were completely aware of the process. Mr. Schoening responded that everyone concerned would be notified <br />as to the time and place for the public hearing. <br /> <br />Councilor Taylor thanked everyone for coming. She hoped that the City could find a way to delay the aerial spraying <br />in order to gain more information. She agreed with Crest area residents that the assessments were “outrageous” and <br />the wrong way to pay for streets. She asked for information on whether the side streets that accessed Crest Drive to <br />get out of their streets could be assessed. She also believed that the Tango Center was important for the downtown <br />for all of the reasons that its proponents had listed. She believed that it fostered a connection to the University and <br />provided a place for youth to go. <br /> <br />Councilor Ortiz thanked everyone for coming. She asked if there would be a difference in the street assessment <br />methodology if the street was classified as a collector versus a local street. Mr. Schoening affirmed that there would <br />be. He said the underlying principle in the assessment code was that regardless of the classification of the street one <br />lived on, everyone would pay the equivalent of a local street assessment. He explained that it would be different for <br />the Maple/Elmira project than for the Crest Drive area. He further explained that the Chad Drive assessments would <br />not be for the bicycle lanes or the center turn lanes, but would pay for the sidewalks and the rest of the asphalt. <br /> <br />Councilor Ortiz ascertained from Mr. Schoening that there were “different monies” for the different parts of the <br />projects. She recalled that in the three years that the City had been involved in the context-sensitive design process <br />with the Crest Drive area residents, they had objected to reclassifying the streets to collectors. Mr. Schoening <br />confirmed this. <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council February 23, 2009 Page 6 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />